What's the deal with instantons?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter pines-demon
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the concept of instantons as presented in Blundell and Lancaster's work. Instantons arise in the context of quantum field theory, particularly when calculating tunneling amplitudes between different vacua using the WKB approximation. The discussion highlights the relationship between instantons and classical solutions with zero energy in imaginary time, emphasizing their role as computational tools rather than physical entities. The topological properties of instantons are noted for their ability to simplify complex calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum field theory principles
  • Familiarity with the WKB approximation in quantum mechanics
  • Knowledge of harmonic oscillators and their propagators
  • Basic concepts of potential energy landscapes in quantum systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the WKB approximation in detail to grasp its application in quantum tunneling
  • Explore the role of topological properties in quantum field theory
  • Read Ryder's "Quantum Field Theory" for insights on instantons and imaginary time
  • Investigate the implications of instantons in cosmology, particularly in relation to inflaton fields
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, particularly those specializing in quantum field theory, cosmologists studying inflationary models, and students seeking to understand advanced quantum mechanics concepts.

pines-demon
Science Advisor
Gold Member
2024 Award
Messages
1,004
Reaction score
850
I am reading Blundell and Lancaster and I am still lost to what they want me to understand about instantons.

So I get the following:
  • By calculating the propagator of a harmonic oscillator, then in Euclidean space the propagator of a potential with a single minima is ##\approx e^{-\omega \tau/2}##, which looks like decay, where ##\tau## is the Euclidean rotated time and ##\omega^2=V''(a)## where ##V(x)## is the potential with minima at #x=a##.
  • Then they go to a double well and say it is mostly the same with more semiclassics
  • They use an inflaton gas to show that the eingenstates of the double well can be approximated as superposition of wavefunctions localized in each side of the well
  • They calculate the decay rate and say that this could apply to the universe.
Can somebody motivate better what I am to learn about it? Is it just a different way to recover semiclassical results? Is it the non-perturbative aspect? Should I think of instantons as particles in any way? Is there anything interesting to the topological nature of instantons? What is a better introduction to instantons?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Demystifier
Physics news on Phys.org
What one really wants to compute is the tunneling amplitude between different vacua. Computing it exactly is complicated, so one uses the WKB approximation. But it turns out that the computation of tunneling WKB amplitude can mathematically be reduced to the computation of classical action with imaginary time (see e.g. Ryder's QFT book). This "imaginary time" is just a mathematical trick in a computation, the physical time is of course not imaginary. To compute the classical action you must first find the corresponding classical solutions. Those solutions have zero energy (because you consider the tunneling between different vacua, which have the same energy that can be taken to be zero), so these solutions, with imaginary time, turn out to be instantons. Those instantons don't exist in a physical sense, they are just a computational tool that arises as a part of the WKB method. Their topological properties are interesting because understanding them simplifies the computations.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeterDonis and pines-demon

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K