- 35,003
- 21,702
What the title says...
Borek said:30 minutes and no black hole yet? I feel cheated.
Borek said:30 minutes and no black hole yet? I feel cheated.
Hans de Vries said:
That was great.Hans de Vries said:Live Coverage: Has the LHC destroyed the Earth yet?
http://www.hasthelhcdestroyedtheearth.com/
Regards, Hans.
Evo said:That was great.
Frame Dragger said:site could turn a profit with some advertising
Borek said:Tin foil hats?
Actually site has quite a lot of traffic (see alexa.com) - I am surprised.
mheslep said:Long, but very good legal brief by UT law professor up on arxiv:
[THE BLACK HOLE CASE: THE INJUNCTION AGAINST THE END OF THE WORLD
http://arxiv.org/pdf/0912.5480
There have been some reputable scientists along the way claiming the case against LHC black holes was not full proof; their story and the story of the LHC responders is discussed, followed by in interesting discussion of how the legal system might approach the argument and assess risk.
Hey it was only a jokemheslep said:Long, but very good legal brief by UT law professor up on arxiv:
[THE BLACK HOLE CASE: THE INJUNCTION AGAINST THE END OF THE WORLD
http://arxiv.org/pdf/0912.5480
There have been some reputable scientists along the way claiming the case against LHC black holes was not full proof; their story and the story of the LHC responders is discussed, followed by in interesting discussion of how the legal system might approach the argument and assess risk.
Hans de Vries said:Hey it was only a jokeDon't forget that how impressive LHC may be for human
standards and how high it's scientific value could be. The energies it produces
are absolutely minute to what occasionally happens above our heads in the
atmosphere.
10 4 eV: Your old television's Cathode Ray Tube
1012 eV: Large Hadron Collider
1020 eV: Highest Energy Cosmic Rays in our atmosphere.
The energy ratio between the electrons in the TV in your living room and the LHC is
the same as the ratio between the LHC energies and those of the cosmic rays hitting
our atmosphere.
Regards, Hans
Yes I thought 50 joules was the highest CR ever recorded. That was indeed the first argument used by the folks in the LHC camp - that if it were possible to create some catastrophic event at the LHC higher energy CRs would have done it already. As you'll see if you dig deeper, the existence of CR's by themselves do not foreclose all possibilities of catastrophe:Hans de Vries said:Hey it was only a jokeDon't forget that how impressive LHC may be for human
standards and how high it's scientific value could be. The energies it produces
are absolutely minute to what occasionally happens above our heads in the
atmosphere.
10 4 eV: Your old television's Cathode Ray Tube
1012 eV: Large Hadron Collider
1020 eV: Highest Energy Cosmic Rays in our atmosphere.
The energy ratio between the electrons in the TV in your living room and the LHC is
the same as the ratio between the LHC energies and those of the cosmic rays hitting
our atmosphere.
Borek said:Thanks, I forgot about the site but just looking makes me really feel better![]()
Hans de Vries said:Live Coverage: Has the LHC destroyed the Earth yet?
http://www.hasthelhcdestroyedtheearth.com/
Regards, Hans.
diogenesNY said:For some added amusement, take a peek at that page's source code.
--diogenesNY
Hans de Vries said:Hey it was only a jokeDon't forget that how impressive LHC may be for human
standards and how high it's scientific value could be. The energies it produces
are absolutely minute to what occasionally happens above our heads in the
atmosphere.
10 4 eV: Your old television's Cathode Ray Tube
1012 eV: Large Hadron Collider
1020 eV: Highest Energy Cosmic Rays in our atmosphere.
The energy ratio between the electrons in the TV in your living room and the LHC is
the same as the ratio between the LHC energies and those of the cosmic rays hitting
our atmosphere.
Regards, Hans
diogenesNY said:A fairly good Q&A FAQ type article on the LHC from the Sunday New York Times 'Week in Review' section:
Perhaps useful for passing around to people wondering what the fuss is about.
Title: 'A Primer on the Great Proton Smashup'
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/04/weekinreview/04overbye.html
diogenesNY
Observables said:What software are they using to do the data analysis of the results?
observables said:what software are they using to do the data analysis of the results?
Hans de Vries said:Live Coverage: Has the LHC destroyed the Earth yet?
http://www.hasthelhcdestroyedtheearth.com/
Regards, Hans.