What's the Best Invented Yet? Your Opinion Counts!

  • Thread starter Noisy Rhysling
  • Start date
In summary: Whatif: The nanobots were used to keep us healthy, happy, and sane, and someone got to decide what all those meant?If you are talking about nano-botic medicine, then that would be a useful invention too and very revolutionistic.
  • #1
Noisy Rhysling
999
344
Among all the things that haven't been invented yet, what's the best? Your opinion counts as much as mine.

My favorite on the grand scale is FTL drives. Get us off this rock and spread out among the stars.

On the personal scale extended longevity systems/devices would be cool.

Specific examples from scifi works?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Immortality. After that, the rest is just patience. :oldbiggrin:
 
  • Like
Likes DennisN and berkeman
  • #3
Borg said:
Immortality. After that, the rest is just patience. :oldbiggrin:
Is this permanent immortality, no "booster shots every thousand years", no spice? Or is it a "okay, you're immortal" kind of thing?
 
  • #4
  • Easy to do human (and other organisms) clones and recombinants!
  • Personal teleporter.
  • Consciousness transferal device/process (for example your consciousness: computer storage device <--> brain).
    This could also be a multiplication device (I will call them many-me!).


  • Direct interface between brain and digital devices.
 
Last edited:
  • #5
My wife says I shouldn't put the tasp on that list, so I won't.
 
  • #6
Noisy Rhysling said:
Is this permanent immortality, no "booster shots every thousand years", no spice? Or is it a "okay, you're immortal" kind of thing?
Doesn't matter. Personally, I expect it to eventually be a brain download kind of thing.
 
  • #7
Borg said:
Doesn't matter. Personally, I expect it to eventually be a brain download kind of thing.
The reason I ask is my favorite immortality scenario: You're permanently and irrevocably immortal. This has issues even if you don't wait for the heat death of the Universe. Say you're charging around the galaxy and fly too close to a neutron star. You hit it and are squished down to a single molecule thickness or less.

But you're immortal, so you don't die.
 
  • #8
I remember a Twilight Zone episode where a guy made a deal with the devil to be immortal. He was later convicted for murder and sentenced to life in prison.
 
  • #9
Noisy Rhysling said:
The reason I ask is my favorite immortality scenario: You're permanently and irrevocably immortal. This has issues even if you don't wait for the heat death of the Universe. Say you're charging around the galaxy and fly too close to a neutron star. You hit it and are squished down to a single molecule thickness or less.

But you're immortal, so you don't die.
He said immortality not invincibility. There is a distinction to be made here. Immortality is the ability to live eternally given the chance, but if I stab you to death you will die. Invincibility on the other hand is a little similar what you're describing, indestructiblity.
If you hit a neutron star and are reduced to a single atom, you are dead. Everything that constitutes "you" is gone. Unless you believe that consciousness is a property of matter- this is a little...

Well if you mean the immortalization of consciousness, that might or might not happen by replicating an identical copy of the human brain onto a computer.
 
Last edited:
  • #10
VuIcan said:
He said immortality not invincibility. There is a distinction to be made here. Immortality is the ability to live eternally given the chance, but if I stab you to death you will die. Invincibility on the other hand is a little similar what you're describing, indestructiblity.
If you hit a neutron star and are reduced to a single atom, you are dead. Everything that constitutes "you" is gone. Unless you believe that consciousness is a property of matter- this is a little...

Well if you mean the immortalization of consciousness, that might or might not happen by replicating an identical copy of the human brain onto a computer.
That would depend on how the immortality has been achieved, I think. And immortality without invincibility is a complete non-starter for me, I wouldn't consider it "immortality", just longevity.
 
  • #11
I think nanotechnology will develop and lead to many small-scale inventions. For example, molecular-sized machines available for the public and society.
Since physics is developing and will continue so in the future, we must come up with some cool inventions, like (as previously said) teleportation and long-distance travel/communication.
Time travel could also be invented in the future.
 
  • #12
Ivan Samsonov said:
I think nanotechnology will develop and lead to many small-scale inventions. For example, molecular-sized machines available for the public and society.
Since physics is developing and will continue so in the future, we must come up with some cool inventions, like (as previously said) teleportation and long-distance travel/communication.
Time travel could also be invented in the future.
Whatif: The nanobots were used to keep us healthy, happy, and sane, and someone got to decide what all those meant?
 
  • #13
Noisy Rhysling said:
Whatif: The nanobots were used to keep us healthy, happy, and sane, and someone got to decide what all those meant?
If you are talking about nano-botic medicine, then that would be a useful invention too and very revolutionistic.
 
  • #14
Ivan Samsonov said:
If you are talking about nano-botic medicine, then that would be a useful invention too and very revolutionistic.
Yeah, fixing damaged cells, repairing accident-caused injuries, making us more calm and receptive to messages relayed by the nanobots from Central Control, things like that.
 
  • #15
That would make surgery and medicine on a molecular-base level more practical and easier. This is a very needed invention!
 
  • #16
Noisy Rhysling said:
That would depend on how the immortality has been achieved, I think. And immortality without invincibility is a complete non-starter for me, I wouldn't consider it "immortality", just longevity.
Given the axiom of heat death or some other form of an equally destructive event, everything is a matter of longevity. I don't quite understand what you're trying to say .

How is it a non-starter? All you have to do is cure aging and most fatal diseases. Unless you're an indestructible particle with an infinite half-life, invincibility is outside the realm of possibility.
 
  • #17
VuIcan said:
All you have to do is cure aging and most fatal diseases.

True.
 
  • #18
VuIcan said:
Given the axiom of heat death or some other form of an equally destructive event, everything is a matter of longevity. I don't quite understand what you're trying to say .

How is it a non-starter? All you have to do is cure aging and most fatal diseases. Unless you're an indestructible particle with an infinite half-life, invincibility is outside the realm of possibility.
I'm saying that invincibility, for me, is part and parcel of immortality. If you can be killed you're not immortal, just very likely to live a long life. My definition, of course.
 
  • #19
The Highlander had immortals which could be killed.
 
  • #20
They were immortal unless they died.

im·mor·tal·i·ty
ˌi(m)ˌmôrˈtalədē/
noun
  1. the ability to live forever; eternal life.
    "eating the fruit gave the gods immortality"
    synonyms: eternal life, everlasting life, deathlessness; More
 
  • Like
Likes BillTre
  • #21
God powers. Immortality would be part of it, but when we start melding our minds with machines, longevity will not be the only thing we can boost. Speed, power, all of it would grow exponentially. It seems like we are just smart enough to start creating technology, but then we had no real reason to evolve much smarter than that. We think of ourselves as a ten on an intelligence scale where 0 is a bacteria and 10 is the most advanced mind. I think cybernetics will make it so that humans now are closer in intelligence to a fruit fly than what we will become.
 
  • #22
On thing I've learned is people always predict things that don't happen.
 

1. What makes an invention the "best"?

The best invention is subjective and can vary depending on personal opinions and needs. Some may consider an invention that improves daily life or solves a problem to be the best, while others may value an invention that advances technology or has a significant impact on society.

2. Who decides what the best invention is?

There is no single authority or group that decides what the best invention is. It is ultimately up to individual preference and perspective.

3. Can an invention be considered the "best" if it has negative consequences?

It is important to consider the potential negative consequences of an invention, even if it is considered the "best" by some. An invention that has negative impacts on the environment, society, or individuals cannot truly be considered the best.

4. Are there any qualifications for an invention to be considered the "best"?

There is no set criteria for an invention to be considered the best. However, some may argue that an invention should have a significant impact, be innovative or groundbreaking, and have a wide-reaching benefit or application.

5. Can an invention be considered the "best" if it is not widely known or used?

An invention does not have to be widely known or used to be considered the "best." It may have a significant impact on a smaller scale or have potential for future widespread use. However, widespread recognition and use can be a factor in determining the impact and success of an invention.

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
925
  • General Discussion
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • STEM Educators and Teaching
2
Replies
37
Views
5K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
21
Views
1K
Writing: Input Wanted Captain's choices on colony ships
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
2
Replies
56
Views
5K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
8
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
6K
Back
Top