What's with all these Halliday/Resnick books?

  • Thread starter Thread starter adartsesirhc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Books
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the various editions and versions of physics textbooks authored by Halliday and Resnick, including titles like "Physics," "Fundamentals of Physics," and their collaborations with other authors like Krane and Walker. It highlights that these books have evolved over time, with earlier editions being more comprehensive and later versions often being simplified or "dumbed down" to cater to a broader audience. The frequent updates and new editions are seen as a marketing strategy by publishers, aimed at encouraging students to purchase the latest versions, which often include new problems and colorful layouts. While some editions are considered better than others, the consensus is that all versions are valuable resources for learning physics. The discussion also touches on the trend in US universities to require specific textbooks for courses, further driving the demand for new editions.
adartsesirhc
Messages
54
Reaction score
0
Seriously, how come there's a ton different books by Halliday or Resnick?

I've heard of:
Physics, by Resnick
Physics, by Halliday
Physics, by Resnick and Halliday
Physics, by Resnick, Halliday, and Krane
Fundamentals of Physics, by Halliday and Resnick
Fundamentals of Physics, by Halliday, Resnick, and Walker

Are they different editions/versions of the same book? I have the 7th edition of the last book.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There's also the new versions split into parts with each volume just containing a few chapters.
It seems to be a feature of US universities to require a particular book for a course and for the publishers to change editions each year ( with different problems and page numbering) to force you to buy the new edition.
One friend lectures a course where they even have to buy an electronic remote control device to answer multiple choice questions for a particular book!
 
Earlier editions of Physics were written by just David Halliday and Robert Resnick, but later editions had the additional authors and (I believe by the sixth edition) the new name of Fundamentals of Physics. Some say that specific editions of the book are better than the others, but I don't believe that any of them are really bad compared to other texts.
 
First, there was Physics, by Halliday and Resnick, which first appeared in the 1960s, I think. It was too "heavy" for many schools, so H & R later produced a slimmed-down version, Fundamentals of Physics. I used it when I was a college freshman in 1971-72. I don't remember whether it was the first or second edition. It had an orange cover so we called it the "pumpkin book."

At some point (1990s?) Krane came on board for Physics, and Walker came on board for Fundamentals of Physics.
 
adartsesirhc said:
Seriously, how come there's a ton different books by Halliday or Resnick?

I've heard of:
Physics, by Resnick
Physics, by Halliday
Physics, by Resnick and Halliday
Physics, by Resnick, Halliday, and Krane
Fundamentals of Physics, by Halliday and Resnick
Fundamentals of Physics, by Halliday, Resnick, and Walker

Are they different editions/versions of the same book? I have the 7th edition of the last book.

Simply put, they get dumbed down a little by each edition, get more colorful, and include new authors. All are great books. Its just not very economic to get the latest edition when you can save a hundred or so getting an older one. And its easier on the eyes.

There are also enhanced editions and "modern topics" editions, even ones split into volumes which include new problems. All a marketing scheme I guess.
 
The book is fascinating. If your education includes a typical math degree curriculum, with Lebesgue integration, functional analysis, etc, it teaches QFT with only a passing acquaintance of ordinary QM you would get at HS. However, I would read Lenny Susskind's book on QM first. Purchased a copy straight away, but it will not arrive until the end of December; however, Scribd has a PDF I am now studying. The first part introduces distribution theory (and other related concepts), which...
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
213
Replies
21
Views
9K
Replies
10
Views
278
Replies
23
Views
5K
Replies
10
Views
6K
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
6K
Back
Top