Wheels, car and friction concepts

AI Thread Summary
Understanding how cars move involves recognizing the role of friction, which is crucial for both acceleration and turning. When a car accelerates, it pushes against the road, and friction provides the necessary grip for this motion, aligning with Newton's third law. During turns, centripetal force is not a separate force but results from the combination of gravity, normal force, and friction, with friction being the key to maintaining the car's path. The interaction between the tires and the road creates a force that allows the car to navigate curves effectively. A deeper exploration of vehicle dynamics can further clarify these concepts.
**Mariam**
Messages
46
Reaction score
1
Hello, I am a high school student and I am studying about rotational motion this term. However, I am having a bit of trouble understanding some concepts about this idea; specifically about cars and turns.

First of all before talking about cars turning corners and the forces there, I don't even think I understand how a car moves. I know that it uses friction, but the idea is unclear. Is it related to Newton's third law, the car pushes on the road and the road pushes back, but where does friction come in play here?

The second part of my question is related to cars when the turn around a curve. I've had a couple of problem solving about these types of questions and I was able to solve them because they are simply about finding the unknowns and using kinematics equations and Newton's 2nd law. However, I don't understand again how friction plays a part in this. We took in class that centripetal force isn't actually a force, so other forces cause it. Like normal, gravity, friction... In the case of the car it is friction, but why and how?

I've been searching for this for over a week now and although I found many detailed answers nothing really made me understand it yet :( , and I feel i am won't understand the lesson unless I can understand this part.
So thanks a lot for anyone who will take the time to explain this puzzling dilemma to me. :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
**Mariam** said:
the car pushes on the road and the road pushes back, but where does friction come in play here?
The pushing is via friction

**Mariam** said:
We took in class that centripetal force isn't actually a force, so other forces cause it. Like normal, gravity, friction... In the case of the car it is friction, but why and how?
There are many threads on this. Search for "friction turning car" or similar.
 
-Try to roll back with your hand over the other free hand feel the friction between your hands the roll hand pushes your free hand backward , if you add some oil on your free hand and repeat the experiment your roll hand won't be able to push the free hand backward)- Consider a rolling wheel the rolling wheel is now directed to certain angel via steering mechanism again the wheel try to push the ground backward but this time with a certain angle , a force will developed at this certain angle , resolving this force to the straight and side directions you will get the forces moving the wheel in forward and side directions. ( in vehicle dynamics they treat the subject more advanced ) but this is a good start to get it .
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top