When are unit vectors helpful?

AI Thread Summary
Unit vectors are useful for simplifying vector calculations by providing a clear way to represent components in the Cartesian plane using i, j, and k notations. They help in determining the unit normal to surfaces, which is essential for calculating exit flux in vector fields through dot products. Additionally, unit vectors streamline the process of finding resultant forces and torques, making it easier to manage calculations without confusion. By using these labels, one can avoid mixing different vector components, enhancing clarity in mathematical operations. Overall, unit vectors serve as a practical tool in vector analysis and physics.
TbbZz
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
When are unit vectors helpful?

It seems to me that it is simply a way to rewrite a given vector component, but with an extra, redundant letter (i, j, k).

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Just one example is the unit normal to a surface: a vector (generally with i, j, and k components) perpendicular to a surface, pointing outward by convention. If you want to know the exit flux of a vector field from a region, for example, you just integrate the dot product of the field and the unit normal.
 
TbbZz said:
When are unit vectors helpful?

It seems to me that it is simply a way to rewrite a given vector component, but with an extra, redundant letter (i, j, k).

Thanks in advance.

When you have forces on an object in the cartesian plane. It makes finding the resultant force about some point easier than taking forces and the angles and using components. Makes torque easier to get with \vec{r} \times \vec{F}
 
Thanks.

So, in other words, i, j, and k are simply labels given to values of Vx, Vy, and Vz to make it easier to keep track of them (i.e. not adding a Vx to a Vy) during calculations?
 
TbbZz said:
Thanks.

So, in other words, i, j, and k are simply labels given to values of Vx, Vy, and Vz to make it easier to keep track of them (i.e. not adding a Vx to a Vy) during calculations?

yes, basically you can think of it like that. Instead of dealing with horizontal and the vertical separately , you can do both without being confused.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top