- #1

- 16

- 3

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- Thread starter annms
- Start date

- #1

- 16

- 3

- #2

BruceW

Homework Helper

- 3,611

- 121

- #3

Doc Al

Mentor

- 45,376

- 1,746

When the charge distribution is spherically symmetric, the field outside the sphere is exactly that of a point charge at the center of the sphere. (Where the charge of the point charge equals the total charge of the sphere.)I was just wondering, under what conditions can a charged sphere be treated as a point charge?

- #4

- 16

- 3

- #5

BruceW

Homework Helper

- 3,611

- 121

So any symmetric distribution you can think of will have this remarkable property.

Edit: For clarity, symmetric just means that the charge distribution will only depend on the radius. (Well, that's probably not the technical meaning of symmetric, but that's what it means in this example).

- #6

- 386

- 5

This means you can apply to whatever the charge distribution, it can be modelled by a equivalent point charge.

- #7

- 610

- 5

This is only true if the sphere is isolated from everything else. If another charge, or another object held at some potential, is brought near the sphere, it will induce surface charges in the sphere that are not spherically symmetric, and therefore you can no longer treat it as a point charge. But if the radius of the sphere is very small compared to characteristic lengths of the system, then you can treat it as a point charge even if it is not isolated because the induced charges will be spherically symmetric as an approximation if the sphere is very small.

- #8

- 386

- 5

This is only true if the sphere is isolated from everything else. If another charge, or another object held at some potential, is brought near the sphere, it will induce surface charges in the sphere that are not spherically symmetric, and therefore you can no longer treat it as a point charge. But if the radius of the sphere is very small compared to characteristic lengths of the system, then you can treat it as a point charge even if it is not isolated because the induced charges will be spherically symmetric as an approximation if the sphere is very small.

But it can still be viewed as an point charge by taking a new gaussian surface where the centre shifts to the new equivalent point charge and take a larger sphere. Everywhere outside the surface the model is still valid.

But when there is an external charge the field is again distorted. Actually the net field should be modelled by another equivalent charge and a even larger sphere as gaussian surface.

- #9

- 610

- 5

But it can still be viewed as an point charge by taking a new gaussian surface where the centre shifts to the new equivalent point charge and take a larger sphere. Everywhere outside the surface the model is still valid.

But when there is an external charge the field is again distorted. Actually the net field should be modelled by another equivalent charge and a even larger sphere as gaussian surface.

I think you are confused. The Guassian-surface trick only works if you have a constant field over the Gaussian surface which will only happens if the charge density if there is symmetry (a spherical Gaussian surface requires a spherically symmetric charge density, a cylindrical Guassian surface requires...,etc). As soon as the symmetry is lost, the Guassian-surface trick no longer works and you have to go to more advanced methods (method of images, Green functions, etc).

- #10

BruceW

Homework Helper

- 3,611

- 121

But it can still be viewed as an point charge by taking a new gaussian surface where the centre shifts to the new equivalent point charge and take a larger sphere. Everywhere outside the surface the model is still valid.

But when there is an external charge the field is again distorted. Actually the net field should be modelled by another equivalent charge and a even larger sphere as gaussian surface.

No, no, no. Even if you shift the centre and use a larger gaussian sphere, the electric field at each point on that gaussian sphere would not be equal. (Because the distribution is no longer symmetric).

Share: