When can you assume dynamic equilibrium?

AI Thread Summary
Dynamic equilibrium can be assumed when the net force acting on an object is zero, meaning the object experiences no acceleration. In the case of a child sliding down a 38° incline, the normal force and weight must balance out the forces acting perpendicular to the slide. The calculations show that the normal force is approximately 180 N when rounded, confirming that the child is not accelerating vertically. The confusion arose from incorrectly aligning the axes, which led to misunderstanding the dynamics of the situation. Understanding the incline's effect on force components clarified the concept of dynamic equilibrium in this scenario.
Coop
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
SOLVED

Homework Statement



A 23 kg child goes down a straight slide inclined 38∘ above horizontal. The child is acted on by his weight, the normal force from the slide, and kinetic friction. Find the magnitude of the normal force.

Homework Equations



cos(theta)=adjacent/hypotenuse

The Attempt at a Solution



I have the answer:

ƩFy=(Fk)y + ny + wy

Where Fk is kinetic friction, n is normal force and w is weight

ƩFy=0+ny+(-178 N) <- 23 kg * 9.81 m/s^2 = 226 N, 226N * cos(38) = 178 N

Now I know the answer is 180 N (rounded), but for that to be true, ƩFy would have to equal 0, which means that the Fnet would equal 0, which would mean that the kid is in dynamic equilibrium and has an acceleration equal to 0. But why is this true? Wouldn't the kid be accelerating while going down the slide?

Thanks,
Coop
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I figured it out. I forgot to to remember that the kid is on an incline, but how I drew it is having the X-axis horizontal, therefore there will not be any acceleration along the Y-axis.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top