When do you not simplify in math?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tyrion101
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Simplify
AI Thread Summary
In mathematics, simplifying expressions is often beneficial for clarity and efficiency, but there are scenarios where it may not be advisable. When solving problems, maintaining a complex expression can help avoid careless mistakes that might arise from oversimplification. Additionally, certain forms, like standard form for quadratic equations, may be less simplified but offer practical advantages for graphing and analysis. If a formula is likely to be reused, simplification can save time, but if it won't be used again or if the simplification process is cumbersome, retaining the original form may be preferable. Ultimately, the decision to simplify depends on the context and the specific goals of the mathematical task.
Tyrion101
Messages
166
Reaction score
2
I have been studying algebra, and a good portion seems to be, getting really long equations to simple ones. My question is is there ever a time in any math where you wouldn't want to simplify? Assuming it isn't just the teacher not caring if you do.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Tyrion101 said:
I have been studying algebra, and a good portion seems to be, getting really long equations to simple ones. My question is is there ever a time in any math where you wouldn't want to simplify? Assuming it isn't just the teacher not caring if you do.

Hi Tyrion101! :smile:

Ultimately you will need to consider whether it is worth to simplify something or not.

When solving a mathematical problem, it's often wise not to simplify the answer.
Simplifying may rob you of a correct answer due to a careless mistake.
On the other hand, if your problem is not solved yet, it may be wise to simplify, so you don't drag a long complicated expression along, increasing the chance on mistakes.

A teacher may want you to simplify, just so you learn how to do it.
But ultimately it's not simplifying that's important, but solving a problem and getting the correct answer, so that for instance a bridge does not fall apart.
In other words, simplifying is a means, but not an end.
 
Tyrion101 said:
I have been studying algebra, and a good portion seems to be, getting really long equations to simple ones. My question is is there ever a time in any math where you wouldn't want to simplify? Assuming it isn't just the teacher not caring if you do.

A simplified formula or expression is often easier to understand, and may be more compact making its use more efficient.

As a basic example, a problem situation you might study could lead to a fairly simple quadratic equation. The equation itself may well be very simple, taking the typical general form. Depending on what you want from this equation, you might wish to put it into standard form, maybe in order to more easily 'sketch' a graph. Converting into the standard form would require a few algebraic steps which themselves are making the equation LESS SIMPLIFIED. The standard form, although seeming to be less simplified, is still useful because of how you can use its features to make a graph manually.
 
To answer briefly (and a little simplified) you would want to simplify a formula if you expect you or someone else may want to use that formula again later. Obviously if you are going to be using a formula for 100 different values, it could save a lot of time by simplifying and removing any redundancies. If you do not expect you will have to use the given formula again or you think the process of simplifying the formula would be more work than it would save, then you might choose to stick with the more complicated formula. Ultimately, it comes down to personal preference most of the time.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top