When Does a Bouncing Ball Come to Rest?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DeldotB
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ball Time
AI Thread Summary
A ball dropped from a height bounces with inelastic collisions, where each bounce's velocity is reduced by a constant of restitution, μ. The time taken for the ball to reach the ground after each bounce can be expressed as a series, with the first bounce taking time t1 = 2μv0/g and subsequent bounces following a geometric progression. The discussion highlights the importance of focusing on the time to reach the ground rather than the height of the bounces. The approach to solving the problem involves using the quadratic formula and recognizing the resulting series as geometric. Ultimately, the conversation emphasizes the correct formulation of the summation to find the total time until the ball comes to rest.
DeldotB
Messages
117
Reaction score
8

Homework Statement


Hello!
A ball is dropped and falls to the floor (no horizontal velocity). It hits the floor and bounces with inelastic collisions. The velocity after each bounce is \mu times the velocity of the previous bounce (here \mu is the constant of restitution). The velocity of the first bounce is just v_0. Find the time it takes for the ball to stop bouncing.

Homework Equations


Newtons Laws

The Attempt at a Solution



Well:
I know this will turn into a convergent geometric series. I am just trying to find what that series will look like.

using the formula h=x_0+v_0t+1/2at^2 its easy to see that the time it takes for the ball to reach the ground is:

h=1/2gt^2 so t=\sqrt{2h/g}.
Using energy I also have: mgh=1/2mv_0^2 so gh=1/2v_0^2

Time for the next bounce: well, the ball now has an upward velocity of \mu v_0 and the height of the first bounce is h'=\mu v_0t-1/2gt^2.

I realize this is a simple problem but for some reason I'm not seeing it. If I solve this equation for time, (using quadratic formula) the resulting series for the times t=t_1+t_2+... isn't geometric and actually quite complicated. Is my approach right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi,
You don't want the height of the next bounce, but the time for the ball to reach the ground again. Easier to solve, too!
 
  • Like
Likes PietKuip
I solved the quadratic for the time. Is this not the right approach?
 
Should lead to the same answer - with a lot more work.
What did you use for ##h'## ?
 
BvU said:
Should lead to the same answer - with a lot more work.

Ahh, I see what you mean. So after the first bounce, I have:

Time for ball to reach ground again: 0= \mu v_0 -1/2gt^2 solvig for t yields: 2 \mu v_0/g so

t_1 =2 \mu v_0/g

Time for ball the reach the ground the third time:

t_2= 2 (\mu)^2 v_0/g
and so on. Is this the right direction?
 
And there you have your geometric sequence !
Make sure you have the right summation: the first t is only 'half a bounce'
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top