When/How does thermal radiation stop (if it stops) and conduction

In summary, "Consider two solid objects in the vacuum (of different materials, if you will) at different temperatures approaching each other until they make "perfect contact" through flat surfaces (no gaps or defects, so that thermal contact conductance effects are absent, even though interfacial thermal resistance may still be present). When the two surfaces make contact the now combined object will quickly reach a temperature overall that is somewhere in between that of the originally separate objects."
  • #1
katelr
4
2
Consider two solid objects in the vacuum (of different materials, if you will) at different temperatures approaching each other until they make "perfect contact" through flat surfaces (no gaps or defects, so that thermal contact conductance effects are absent, even though interfacial thermal resistance may still be present).
Of course, before making contact, they exchange heat via electromagnetic radiation. My question is: is this heat exchange via thermal radiation still present once the bodies are making contact with each other and exchanging heat via thermal conduction? (Please explain what's going on in terms of the constituent particles of the bodies.)
 
  • Like
Likes OmCheeto
Science news on Phys.org
  • #2
When the two surfaces make contact the now combined object will quickly reach a temperature overall that is somewhere in between that of the originally separate objects.
(unless one of the objects is composed of material with extremely low thermal conductance.)
The combined object will still emit radiative heat assuming there are no other external heat sources to complicate things.
 
  • #3
I think what the OP is trying to ask is about IR radiation, even internally in an object. Certainly, an atom can emit a photon which is absorbed by a neighboring atom. But I suspect that is included in what we call heat conduction, or ignored when conduciton is active.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermal_conduction said:
In conduction, the heat flow is within and through the body itself. In contrast, in heat transfer by thermal radiation, the transfer is often between bodies, which may be separated spatially. Also possible is transfer of heat by a combination of conduction and thermal radiation.
 
  • Like
Likes katelr
  • #4
To add to that, from the same Wikipedia article: "In solids, conduction is mediated by the combination of vibrations and collisions of molecules, of propagation and collisions of phonons ([sic], not photons), and of diffusion and collisions of free electrons." So, whoever wrote that did not consider exchanged photons as part of thermal conduction. However, I guess that when measuring thermal conductivity in the laboratory it's hard to isolate those effects, so that they are lumped all together and called "thermal conduction" (I emphasize I'm guessing).
Further information: when they talk about combined conduction-radiation in that Wikipedia article, I think they refer to semi-transparent media, in the sense of this article from thermopedia: Coupled (combined) radiation and conduction.
 
  • Like
Likes anorlunda
  • #5
If the objects are transparent to IR I see no reason why thermal radiation from one to the other shouldn't occur as well as conduction.
 
  • #6
I almost got the full answer from anorlunda above, when he/she said "Certainly, an atom can emit a photon which is absorbed by a neighboring atom." (as a mechanical engineer, I'm ignorant about physics at this level, so this phrase alone was good guidance.)
Let met share the answer I got from physics.stackexchange.com by user Thomas Lee Abshier ND. Here I include a fragment:
...as long as the absorption/emission frequencies of two substances overlap, radiation can emit and absorb between the two masses. In summary, "Will two materials continue to exchange radiation energy once they were in intimate thermal conductive contact." The answer is yes.​
 
  • #7
CWatters said:
If the objects are transparent to IR I see no reason why thermal radiation from one to the other shouldn't occur as well as conduction.
Out of curiosity, if a substance is transparent to a frequency, what are the chances that radiation of that frequency can be produced?
 
  • #8
katelr said:
I almost got the full answer from anorlunda above, when he/she said "Certainly, an atom can emit a photon which is absorbed by a neighboring atom." (as a mechanical engineer, I'm ignorant about physics at this level, so this phrase alone was good guidance.)
Let met share the answer I got from physics.stackexchange.com by user Thomas Lee Abshier ND. Here I include a fragment:
...as long as the absorption/emission frequencies of two substances overlap, radiation can emit and absorb between the two masses. In summary, "Will two materials continue to exchange radiation energy once they were in intimate thermal conductive contact." The answer is yes.​
You are looking at depth of penetration of radiation, and that is substance and frequency dependent. As an example, lead is commonly designated as the material to use for absorption of ionizing radiation, rather than say wood. Gamma or x-ray will penetrate into lead measured in mm, while for concrete it is cm.
 
  • #9
Most of the energy that is transferred from the interior of the sun to its surface is in the form of thermal radiation, despite the high density of solar matter. However, the average time it takes for a photon to diffuse from the core to the surface is quite long. So, it is possible to have radiative heat transfer inside condensed phase objects.
 
  • #10
@katelr, the way you worded your original post, it is not clear if you are asking about radiation heat transfer between two objects, or internal heat transfer within one object. In the OP, you stuck two together as if to make one.

Please clarify.
 
  • #11
i posted a thread about infrared thermometry remote sensing
https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/infrared-thermometry-remote-sensing.951806/
based on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stefan–Boltzmann_law
$$ j*= \sigma T^4 $$
the amount of energy heat radiated on a (black) body is the temperature in kelvins to the power of 4.
my thoughts are that when 2 bodies are in contact, both conduction and (black body) radiation/absorption continues
the relative amount of energy/heat exchange would thus be mainly be determined by the temperature of the bodies.
at low temperatures conduction dominates, at high temperatures (black body) radiation dominates
 
  • #12
anorlunda said:
@katelr, the way you worded your original post, it is not clear if you are asking about radiation heat transfer between two objects, or internal heat transfer within one object. In the OP, you stuck two together as if to make one.

Please clarify.
I'm not sure where the lack of clarity is, so I'm going to talk about a practical implication: insulation of home attics. In modern practice it is customary to place, facing the ceiling, a foil of aluminium inside the attic to reflect the thermal radiation coming from the ceiling. Products like this are commonplace. Turns out that there happens to be some talking around the internet saying that the foil of aluminium should not touch the ceiling arguing that it would otherwise not reflect the radiation. (The fact that, once in contact with the ceiling, it will transfer its heat by conduction to the aluminium is a different problem we need not talk about.) So, my post comes from wondering why the reflection would stop once the bodies are in contact.
 
  • #13
256bits said:
Out of curiosity, if a substance is transparent to a frequency, what are the chances that radiation of that frequency can be produced?

Actually asking or pointing out the physics? Anyhow, your implication is correct. Emissivity and absorption are two sides of the same coin. Low absorption at a given wavelength (highly transparent or highly reflective whether specular or scattering) means low emissivity at that wavelength, i.e. low thermal glow per Kirchoff’s law.
 
  • #14
Cutter Ketch said:
Actually asking or pointing out the physics? Anyhow, your implication is correct. Emissivity and absorption are two sides of the same coin. Low absorption at a given wavelength (highly transparent or highly reflective whether specular or scattering) means low emissivity at that wavelength, i.e. low thermal glow per Kirchoff’s law.
That is the way I understood.
Really I was actually pondering, or asking, if there ever was a gothcha !
 

1. When does thermal radiation stop?

Thermal radiation does not stop completely as it is a continuous process. However, it can be reduced or minimized by blocking the source of radiation or by increasing the distance between the source and the object.

2. How does thermal radiation stop?

Thermal radiation can be stopped by using materials that are opaque to radiation, such as metals or thick layers of insulating materials. These materials absorb and reflect the radiation, preventing it from reaching the object.

3. Does thermal radiation ever completely stop?

No, thermal radiation does not completely stop unless the temperature of the object and its surroundings are the same. In this case, there is no temperature difference for radiation to occur.

4. When does conduction stop?

Conduction stops when there is no longer a temperature difference between two objects in contact with each other. This is because heat transfer through conduction occurs due to the difference in temperature between the objects.

5. How does conduction stop?

Conduction can be stopped by insulating materials that prevent the transfer of heat between two objects. It can also be reduced by increasing the distance between the objects or by decreasing the temperature difference between them.

Similar threads

  • Thermodynamics
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
998
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • Thermodynamics
Replies
3
Views
35K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • Thermodynamics
Replies
20
Views
9K
  • Thermodynamics
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Thermodynamics
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top