When is Indistinguishability Neglected in Atom Sample Calculations?

  • Thread starter Thread starter benedwards2020
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Indistinguishability
benedwards2020
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
I have been asked to find whether or not indistinguishability may or may not be ignored from a given sample of atoms at a given temperature.

The calculation I have done fine, but my question is given that the criterion for neglecting indistinguishability has to satisfy

de broglie wavelength << average distance between atoms

How much is considered 'a lot less'?

In my answer I have found the de Broglie wavelength to be a single order of magnitude less than the separation. Is this considered a lot less??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In my experience, one order of magnitude is generally a reasonable cut-off for the vague >> and << notions.

Perhaps it would be better to report how significant it is, and let the person who gave you this task to judge for themselves, since "may or may not be ignored" is completely subjective.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top