When is Lift on an aerofoil proportional to velocity?,

AI Thread Summary
Lift on an aerofoil can be directly proportional to velocity under specific conditions, particularly at very low wind velocities where the flow may resemble creeping flow or Stokes flow. Experimental results showed a proportional relationship between lift and velocity, with a gradient of exactly 1, suggesting a linear correlation. However, this relationship may not hold at higher Reynolds numbers, where flow becomes turbulent. The discussion highlights the importance of flow characteristics in determining lift behavior. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for accurate lift coefficient calculations.
Andrew__
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello,
I was doing my physics coursework, and blew a hairdryer at my makeshift aerofoil across distances of about 10cm and wind velocities of 8-11 m/s, then measured the lift off of a balance. I found they were proportional, exactly (!?), after doing some research I found drag is proportional to velocity for a laminar flow with no turbulence, could this be a similar case but for just very low wind velocities and lift? The gradient of the trendline on excel was *exactly 1 and no constant on the end (through the origin) for speed vs lift, and so was the gradient of a log graph. The reason is I doubt I will be able to find lift coefficients using the V^2 rule, thank you very much in advance?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I mean the lift vs speed graph was directly proportional (not a gradient of 1)
 
If your Reynolds number is small enough that the flow can be considered creeping flow (aka Stokes flow) then yes, both drag and lift will be directly proportional (or very nearly so) to the velocity. I would doubt your Reynolds number is low enough for that, though.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top