When is the Particle at Equilibrium Position?

AI Thread Summary
The equilibrium position of the particle described by the function x(t) = 5 cos(3t + 2) occurs when x(t) = 0. This leads to the equation 3t + 2 = (π/2) + πn, where n is an integer, indicating multiple times the particle is at equilibrium. A negative time solution, such as t = -0.14s, signifies that the particle was at equilibrium 0.14 seconds before t = 0, which is not relevant for practical scenarios. In real-life applications, only positive time values are considered meaningful, as the motion begins at t = 0. Understanding this concept clarifies the interpretation of negative solutions in oscillatory motion.
Lengalicious
Messages
162
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Position of particle is given by:
x(t) = 5 cos (3t +2)

At what time after t = 0 is the particle at the equilibrium position?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I understand the equilibrium position to be the point where x(t) = 0 since x(t) is thedisplacement from the equilibrium position is it not? But when i re-arrange for t, i get t = -0.14s, negative? Just doesn't seem right what am I doing wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Remember, the cosine function has an infinite number of 0s and your oscillator returns to the equilibrium position an infinite number of times (assuming it never slows down). Your function is at equilibrium whenever 3t + 2 = {{\pi}\over{2}} + \pi n where n = 0, \pm 1, \pm 2, \pm 3.... Each of these values of n gives you a different time where the particle will be at equilibrium. The meaning of a negative answer is simply that .14s in the past, it was at equilibrium.

When you get "realistic" about the problem in real life, however, you simply say that particle begins motion at t = 0 and you don't care about negative times. In fact, if you recall basic kinematics problems with cannons and all that good stuff, you would have had the same problem. Say you dropped a ball off a cliff and wanted to know at what time it would have reached a certain height. The math would tell you that there are 2 times where the ball would have reached that height, one being negative. You start the experiment at t = 0, though, so negative answers are unphysical or uninteresting to you at the least.
 
Omg so obvious when you see it layed out infront of you, thanks a lot for the help.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top