When is the spacecraft arrival detected?

  • Thread starter Thread starter nickek
  • Start date Start date
nickek
Messages
21
Reaction score
1
Hi!
Suppose a spacecraft is going to travel 10 lightyears in the velocity of 0.9c (in the Earth reference frame). Obviously, the travel takes 10/0.9=11.1 years for an observer on the Earth. According to special relativity theory, the travellers measure the time to 3.5 years. But: When is the arrival to the point 10 lightyears away from the Earth detected, i.e we can "see" the spacecraft at this point on the Earth? Is it possible to do at the time 11.1 years from start, or do we have to wait 11.1 + 10 = 21.1 years?

Thanks for input!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
nickek said:
Hi!
Suppose a spacecraft is going to travel 10 lightyears in the velocity of 0.9c (in the Earth reference frame). Obviously, the travel takes 10/0.9=11.1 years for an observer on the Earth. According to special relativity theory, the travellers measure the time to 3.5 years. But: When is the arrival to the point 10 lightyears away from the Earth detected, i.e we can "see" the spacecraft at this point on the Earth? Is it possible to do at the time 11.1 years from start, or do we have to wait 11.1 + 10 = 21.1 years?

Thanks for input!
Hi nickek, welcome to PF!

You are correct, the light from the arrival event comes back to the Earth at t=21.1 years. Knowing that the arrival event was 10 ly away the people on Earth then calculate that the event happened at t=11.1 years.
 
Great, thank you!
 
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top