When Should I Beware of Factoring Out?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DocZaius
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Factoring
DocZaius
Messages
365
Reaction score
11
Consider this equation:

7x*tan(4x)=5x

Initially, one might think to simply factor the x out of each side of the equation and be left with this:

tan(4x)=\frac{5}{7}

Well that's wrong! That is only one solution! The other solution is:

x=0

You should instead have done the following:

7x*tan(4x)=5x
7x*tan(4x)-5x=0
x(7tan(4x)-5)=0

x=0\ OR\ tan(4x)=\frac{5}{7}

Now my question is: What properties of the initial equation should give me pause and should cause me to supress my reflex to factor the x out of the equation? Although in hindsight it is obvious that plugging in "0" for x would be a solution, that doesn't explain why doing a seemingly allowed operation (dividing each side by 7x) would withhold a solution from you.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Actually, it's not the "factoring out" that creates the problem. It is the fact that you divided both sides of the equation by x. Factoring, as you have demonstrated, is the correct way to do the problem. When you divide both sides by x, you are implicitly assuming that x is not zero. That is what causes you to miss part of the solution. So my advice would be either always work such problems by factoring or, if you must divide by some factor, remember to check that factor for other solutions.
 
The problem can be avoided by always first isolating the variable to one side of the equation.
 
Yes you are right LCKurtz, I did not use the term "factoring out" correctly there.

But wow, thanks! Would you say that the following sentence is correct then?

"Cancelling a variable out of an equation implicitly assumes it is not zero"

If that is true, then I have gone through many years of math making erroneous assumptions!

Edit: I tried to think of the simplest equation possible to illustrate this issue and this is the best I could come up with. Is this correct math?

x*f(x)=x
x(f(x)-1)=0
x=0\ OR\ f(x)=1
 
Last edited:
Yes, that's the right way to do it.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top