When to hyphenate and when not to hyphenate?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DaveC426913
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Hyphenation rules often depend on the relationship between words in a phrase. In the case of "federally funded program," hyphenation is unnecessary because "federally" is an adverb modifying the adjective "funded," making the meaning clear. However, using "federal-funded program" would imply that both "federal" and "funded" describe the program, which can lead to ambiguity. The discussion also highlights that in adjective-adjective-noun sequences, hyphenation clarifies which adjectives modify the noun. Understanding these grammatical nuances is essential for effective copy editing.
DaveC426913
Gold Member
Messages
23,831
Reaction score
7,829
I do a fair amount of amateur copy editing and often come across terms that look to me like they should be hyphenated, but what's the rule on that? (My Strunk & White is packed away.)

I just saw a TV commercial that talked about "a federally funded program". I might consider hyphenating that, but is there more to it than just personal preference?
 
Science news on Phys.org
DaveC426913 said:
I do a fair amount of amateur copy editing and often come across terms that look to me like they should be hyphenated, but what's the rule on that? (My Strunk & White is packed away.)

I just saw a TV commercial that talked about "a federally funded program". I might consider hyphenating that, but is there more to it than just personal preference?
You don't have to hyphenate in that case because federally is an adverb and, in this case, qualifies the adjective funded. It's unambiguous, therefore, that it's the funding that's federal.

If you had "federal funded program", then the program would be federal and funded. Whereas, a "federal-funded" programme is not necessarily federal but is funded federally.

PS although grammatically it would be better to take a different example. Such as "red-rimmed glasses"; as opposed to "poorly fitting glasses".
 
  • Like
Likes scottdave and berkeman
So, in an adjective-adjective-noun sequence, the hyphen indicates that adjective-1 qualifies only adjective-2, and not the noun...

"red rimmed glasses" denotes glasses that are both red and rimmed
"red-rimmed glasses" denotes glasses that are merely rimmed with red

(Though, I guess, to be pedantic, the former should be "red, rimmed glasses"?)

And you're saying "federally-funded program" is redundant because "federally" is an adverb and thus can only apply to the verb "funded".
 
DaveC426913 said:
And you're saying "federally-funded program" is redundant because "federally" is an adverb and thus can only apply to the verb "funded".
An adverb may describe not only a verb, but an adjective or another adverb. E.g.

Terribly hot day.

He talked very quietly.

Ps "funded" here is a verbal adjective.
 
  • Like
Likes DaveC426913
One of my favourite grammatical constructions is the adjectival phrase. E.g. on that never-to-be-forgotten day".
 
I use Grammarly and it gave the following

never-to-be-forgotten day
federally funded program
federal funded program; although recommended changing federal to federally.
red-rimmed glasses
 
Historian seeks recognition for first English king https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c9d07w50e15o Somewhere I have a list of Anglo-Saxon, Wessex and English kings. Well there is nothing new there. Parts of Britain experienced tribal rivalries/conflicts as well as invasions by the Romans, Vikings/Norsemen, Angles, Saxons and Jutes, then Normans, and various monarchs/emperors declared war on other monarchs/emperors. Seems that behavior has not ceased.

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
64
Views
15K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Back
Top