When to Use Maxima or Minima Equations in Thin-Film Interference?

  • Thread starter Thread starter VitaX
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Interference
AI Thread Summary
In thin-film interference, the equations for maxima and minima depend on the film's thickness and the order of interference. The maxima equation is used for bright fringes, while the minima equation is for dark fringes, with specific values of m indicating the order of interference. The discussion highlights confusion over whether to use the bright or dark fringe equations and how to determine the correct approach for calculating film thickness. The participant calculated thickness values for both bright and dark fringes but was unsure about the correct interpretation of results. Understanding when to apply each equation is crucial for solving interference problems effectively.
VitaX
Messages
183
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



[PLAIN]http://img135.imageshack.us/img135/6027/physicsch3569.png

Homework Equations



2L = (m + 0.5) (λ/n) for m = 0, 1, 2, ... (maxima - bright film in air)
2L = m(λ/n) for m = 0, 1, 2, ... (minima - dark film in air)

The Attempt at a Solution



Bright
2L = (10 + 0.5)(630E-9/1.5)
L = 2.205E-6 m

Dark
2L = 9(630E-9/1.5)
L = 1.89E-6 m

Is this the right approach? I was thinking the change in film thickness would be the difference between the two L values. But the book gives the answer as 1.89 E-6 m. Which is what I got for the Dark set of fringes. So was I supposed to negate the bright ones or did I use the wrong approach here?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Someone told me to use the maxima equation with values of m being 0 and 9 and take the difference. I get the answer in the book then. But, how do you know when to use the maxima or minima equations for questions like this? I understand why we using 0 to 9 as the m values instead of 0 to 10, because 0-9 is 10 fringes. At least I think that's the reasoning behind it.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top