When to use quadratic equations?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of quadratic equations in kinematics, specifically in the context of a swimmer's motion after jumping from a diving board. The original poster seeks clarity on when to use quadratic equations versus linear kinematic equations in solving problems related to projectile motion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to understand the criteria for using quadratic equations in kinematic problems, expressing confusion over the use of the equation v = v(i) + at. Some participants question the assumptions made regarding the time of flight and the conditions at which the swimmer enters the water.

Discussion Status

Participants have provided insights into the problem, suggesting that the swimmer's motion can be analyzed in two phases: the ascent to the peak and the descent into the pool. There is a recognition of the need to calculate the swimmer's velocity just before entering the water, and some participants suggest using the quadratic distance equation for practice.

Contextual Notes

The original poster's confusion stems from the initial application of linear equations without considering the full trajectory of the swimmer's motion. There is an ongoing exploration of the implications of using different equations based on the problem's requirements.

struggtofunc
Messages
15
Reaction score
1
Hello everyone! Apologies if this is a very repetitive question but I have gone through previous forum posts and am still struggling to understand how to identify which equations are appropriate. In the problem below, I have used the kinematic equation of "v = v(i) + at" but my answer is incorrect. Rather, I was told to use a quadratic equation. My question is, what determines whether to use a quadratic equation of not? I was under the impression that because I had the values of v(i), v, and a, that i could simply use the kinematic equation. Why would this be incorrect?

Again, I'm very sorry if I have posted this incorrectly. Any help would be much appreciated!

Thank you very much!

J

1. Homework Statement

A swimmer bounces straight up from a diving board and falls feet first into a pool. She starts with a velocity of 4.00 m/s, and her takeoff point is 1.80 m above the pool. (a) How long are her feet in the air?

y(i)=1.80m
y = 0m
a = -9.8 ms-2
v(i) = 4.00 ms-1

Homework Equations


y-y(i) = v(i)t + (1/2)(a)(t^2)
or
v = v(i) + at

The Attempt at a Solution


I have used the equation v = v(i) + at and calculated the answer as:

0 = 4.00 + (-9.8)(t)

t = (-4.00)/(-9.8)
t = 0.408 seconds
 
Physics news on Phys.org
struggtofunc said:
Hello everyone! Apologies if this is a very repetitive question but I have gone through previous forum posts and am still struggling to understand how to identify which equations are appropriate. In the problem below, I have used the kinematic equation of "v = v(i) + at" but my answer is incorrect. Rather, I was told to use a quadratic equation. My question is, what determines whether to use a quadratic equation of not? I was under the impression that because I had the values of v(i), v, and a, that i could simply use the kinematic equation. Why would this be incorrect?

Again, I'm very sorry if I have posted this incorrectly. Any help would be much appreciated!

Thank you very much!

J

1. Homework Statement

A swimmer bounces straight up from a diving board and falls feet first into a pool. She starts with a velocity of 4.00 m/s, and her takeoff point is 1.80 m above the pool. (a) How long are her feet in the air?

y(i)=1.80m
y = 0m
a = -9.8 ms-2
v(i) = 4.00 ms-1

Homework Equations


y-y(i) = v(i)t + (1/2)(a)(t^2)
or
v = v(i) + at

The Attempt at a Solution


I have used the equation v = v(i) + at and calculated the answer as:

0 = 4.00 + (-9.8)(t)

t = (-4.00)/(-9.8)
t = 0.408 seconds
You have calculated the time for her to reach zero vertical speed. At what speed does she enter the pool?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: struggtofunc
Thanks for your reply! I think I see the problem now. So because the question is asking for time in the air, my V(f) value should be calculated just before she reaches rest. Thankyou!
 
tnich said:
You have calculated the time for her to reach zero vertical speed. At what speed does she enter the pool?

In other words, you have calculated the time after which she is at the highest point. Now you have to add the time it takes to fall down into the pool.

struggtofunc said:
Thanks for your reply! I think I see the problem now. So because the question is asking for time in the air, my V(f) value should be calculated just before she reaches rest. Thankyou!

she won't be at rest when she hits the water. she'll be at her highest speed just before she hits the water.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: struggtofunc
Thankyou for your help! Would it be appropriate to solve this in two steps? One to reach the peak of trajectory motion and one to reach the pool?
 
struggtofunc said:
Thankyou for your help! Would it be appropriate to solve this in two steps? One to reach the peak of trajectory motion and one to reach the pool?
Consider how you could calculate her velocity when her feet touch the water.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: struggtofunc
To the OP: You know the position ## y ## where her feet are as they touch the water, i.e. basically you know ## y_{water}-y_{initial} ##. What equation might work best, given that information?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: struggtofunc
tnich said:
Consider how you could calculate her velocity when her feet touch the water.
I think it would be much easier to use the other equation.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: struggtofunc
Thanks for all the help everyone!

I've calculated the time using two equations rather than quadratics:

v^2 = v(i)^2 + 2a(x-x(i))
v^2 = (4.00)^2 + 2(-9.8)(-1.80)

v = square root of 51.28 = +- 7.16 ms-1

v = v(i) + at
t = (+-7.16 - 4.00)/(-9.8)
t = - 0.32 s
t = 1.14 s

Thank you all so much! J
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Charles Link
  • #10
struggtofunc said:
Thankyou for your help! Would it be appropriate to solve this in two steps? One to reach the peak of trajectory motion and one to reach the pool?

it could certainly be done in more than one step. However, now that you have the time it takes to get up to the highest point of her jump you'd need to calculate how high she's up in the air. you need the information to calculate the time it takes to fall from this height, given that the speed at this point is 0 m/s.

you could use the exact same equation to calculate it all in one step. with initial height that of the board and initial velocity when she jumps off the board.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: struggtofunc
  • #11
Suggestion is to use the distance equation that is quadratic in time, especially if you haven't had much practice with quadratic equations. It's a good way to get practice with solving a quadratic equation. I didn't check your answer yet using the method that you used, but you should get the same answer using the distance equation ## y-y_i=v_i t +(\frac{1}{2})at^2 ##. ## \\ ## Editing: I have now checked your solution, and it is correct. And I also got the same answer using the above distance equation.
 
Last edited:
  • #12
struggtofunc said:
Thanks for all the help everyone!

I've calculated the time using two equations rather than quadratics:

v^2 = v(i)^2 + 2a(x-x(i))
v^2 = (4.00)^2 + 2(-9.8)(-1.80)

v = square root of 51.28 = +- 7.16 ms-1

v = v(i) + at
t = (+-7.16 - 4.00)/(-9.8)
t = - 0.32 s
t = 1.14 s

Thank you all so much! J
I can't see any fault with that. You have done exactly the same calculations that would have been required to solve the quadratic.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: struggtofunc and Charles Link

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
40
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K