When was the Chain rule first used?

  • Thread starter Thread starter goodoldrebel
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Chain Chain rule
goodoldrebel
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Since Calculus has supposedly been around for a long time, when is there actual evidence of the chain rule first being used?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Vagn said:
Leibniz used it but didn't express it explicitly.
The first instance of it in it's modern form was in Lagrange's 1797 Théorie des fonctions analytiques.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chain_rule#History

Thanks for the input. I suspected that it's been a relatively recent form.
 
I can't imagine why you would think that. The chain rule is a necessity for differentiating all but the simplest functions.
 
HallsofIvy said:
I can't imagine why you would think that. The chain rule is a necessity for differentiating all but the simplest functions.

Well, but would take some time for matematicians to see the general pattern we call the chain rule, and then prove its generality.

For example, Euler's brilliant invention of modern day function notation (think it was him) simplified notationally what one was doing, enabling the discovery of the pattern.
 
HallsofIvy said:
I can't imagine why you would think that. The chain rule is a necessity for differentiating all but the simplest functions.


I understand that but its use has only been documented in the late 18th century (see above). Being used earlier in its complete format lacks verifiable evidence.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top