When will bones become fossils?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Loren Booda
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    fossils
AI Thread Summary
Skeletal calcium is gradually replaced by mineral deposition, but the speed and type of mineral replacement depend on various factors like rock type and pore water chemistry. Fossilization is a continuous process as long as pore water is present, and fossils can be defined as remnants or traces of past organisms, regardless of mineralization. Observations indicate that fossils from the North Sea show minimal mineralization up to 30-40,000 years, while older Eemian remains over 130,000 years are heavily mineralized. However, chemical alterations in these older fossils prevent radiological dating, leading to reliance on other dating clues. Notably, some Eemian vertebrae, like those from an Arctic whale, can remain unmineralized despite their age.
Loren Booda
Messages
3,108
Reaction score
4
Over how long is skeletal calcium essentially replaced by mineral depositation?
 
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
I don't know too much about bones, but with calcium carbonate in sea shells, it can be very variable. Mineral replacement will vary in speed and type with rock type, pore water movement pore water chemistry etc, so its hard to give a definate answer. I'll dig through my notes tomorrow to see if I can come up with any rough figures for you. It should be noted that as long as pore water is present, dissolution, deposition and replacement of minerals won't stop, so diagenesis and fossilisation could be viewed as continuous processes.
 
First of all, fosils are most broadly defined as remnant, impression, or trace of an organism of past geologic ages that has been preserved in the Earth's crust.
Fossil do not need to be mineralized to be fossils. From what I have observed about fossils from the North sea when caught in fish trawlers net, there is little mineralization up to 30-40,000 years. However, Eemian (Sangamonian) remains >130,000 years are heavily mineralized.
The setback here is that those fossils can not be dated radiological because of that chemical alteration. So we assume something to be "Eemian" or "Sangamonian" from other clues. I've seen an "Eemian" vertebra of a Arctic whale that was not mineralized at all, the complete skeleton was found on a hill (!) at one of the October revolution Islands, north of Siberia.
 
Hello, I’m currently writing a series of essays on Pangaea, continental drift, and Earth’s geological cycles. While working on my research, I’ve come across some inconsistencies in the existing theories — for example, why the main pressure seems to have been concentrated in the northern polar regions. So I’m curious: is there any data or evidence suggesting that an external cosmic body (an asteroid, comet, or another massive object) could have influenced Earth’s geology in the distant...
On August 10, 2025, there was a massive landslide on the eastern side of Tracy Arm fjord. Although some sources mention 1000 ft tsunami, that height represents the run-up on the sides of the fjord. Technically it was a seiche. Early View of Tracy Arm Landslide Features Tsunami-causing slide was largest in decade, earthquake center finds https://www.gi.alaska.edu/news/tsunami-causing-slide-was-largest-decade-earthquake-center-finds...
Back
Top