Where can I find a covariant approach to Poisson brackets?

luxxio
Messages
44
Reaction score
0
i am searching for a detailed discussion on the relativistic poisson brackets. where i can found it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
See about Pierls bracket. For example, see the book on QFT by DeWitt.
 
Why should the Poisson bracket be different for relativistic and non-relativistic fields/particles?
 
crackjack said:
Why should the Poisson bracket be different for relativistic and non-relativistic fields/particles?
Poisson brackets require a choice of a special time coordinate, so they are not relativistic covariant.
 
A Yahoo search for "relativistic Poisson bracket" (it may be picky with correct spelling) yields a single hit: http://landau.rice.edu/~aac/pubs/Phys-Plasmas.pdf

However, a better search phrase is "covariant phase space" which yields ca 142,000 hits on Google. Even better, searching for "covariant phase space"+Larsson yields six hits on Yahoo, all apparently written by a younger myself.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...

Similar threads

Back
Top