Courses Where Can I Find a Math-Based Physics Book for Electricity and Magnetism?

  • Thread starter Thread starter diegocas
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Course Physics
AI Thread Summary
A mathematician studying physics seeks a physics book that embraces advanced mathematics, particularly in the context of electricity and magnetism. The discussion emphasizes the need for resources that do not shy away from complex concepts like line integrals and Stoke's theorem. Recommendations include a second-year college Electricity and Magnetism course using MKS units and the Dover book "Mathematics of Classical and Quantum Physics." Additionally, a book discussing electromagnetism from an axiomatic perspective using differential geometry is suggested, appealing to those with a strong mathematical background. Other high-level mathematical texts are mentioned for mechanics, quantum mechanics, and general relativity, reinforcing the preference for rigorous mathematical treatment in physics literature.
diegocas
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Hi! I'm a mathematician but I'm now stuyding some physics. I like it, but I am not completely satisfied with the presentation in ordinary books. I want to find a physics book with no fear for math! In traditional textbooks, line integrals, surface integrals, Stoke's theorem is always avoided! I hope someone could recommend a good math-based physics book. I'm especially interested in electricity and magnetism.
Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I recommend a 2nd year college Electricity and Magnetism course. My preference, being an experimenter, would be for a course using MKS units. Thus quantities are volts, amps, Tesla, Coulombs, Farads, Henrys, amp-turns, meters etc. Avoid most EE courses (generally they minimize the math). Advanced EE electricial circuits courses MAY get into poles, zeroes, and stability diagrams.
 
While not focusing on e&m you may enjoy the Dover book 'Mathematics of classical and quantum physics'.

http://www.amazon.com/dp/048667164X/?tag=pfamazon01-20

EDIT: on second thought, this may not be what you are looking for (ie: perhaps you looking for a differential forms treatment of E&M?)
 
Last edited:
Hi,

You might want to take a look at the following book:
https://www.amazon.com/dp/0817642226/?tag=pfamazon01-20

It basically discusses electromagnetism from an axiomatic point in terms of differential geometry. Especially if you are a mathematician this will probably be very interesting.
Parts of it are available online on the homepage of the author:
http://www.thp.uni-koeln.de/gravitation/mitarbeiter/Birkshowme.pdf"

A few suggestions for other topics (I only cite books which are on a mathematically quite high level):
Mechanics: Mathematical Methods in Classical Mechanics by V.I. Arnol'd
Quantum Mechanics: Mathematical Concepts of Quantum Mechanics by Gustafson and Sigal
and of course the books by Reed and Simon
GR: Large Scale Structure of Space-time by Hawking and Ellis
 
Last edited by a moderator:
robphy said:
Purcell

Seconded.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Replies
102
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Back
Top