Where Can I Find Nuclear Well Logging and MRI Animations for Presentations?

  • Thread starter Thread starter The Prince
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mri Nuclear
AI Thread Summary
Recommendations for websites featuring animations on Nuclear well logging and Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Imaging were requested to aid in presentations. A suggestion was made to check the Center for Applied Scientific Computing at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory for relevant resources. The requester emphasized the need for animations specifically to help classmates grasp the physics of MRI. Despite initial searches, the focus remained on finding animated content. The discussion highlights the importance of visual aids in understanding complex scientific concepts.
The Prince
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Hey ,

Actually I need someone to recommend some useful web sites that would contians animations about Nuclear well logging and Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Imaging to help me in my presentations . :cool:
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Have you googled on those terms? You will get millions of hits.
 
The Prince said:
Hey ,

Actually I need someone to recommend some useful web sites that would contians animations about Nuclear well logging and Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Imaging to help me in my presentations . :cool:
The Prince,

Courtesy of the Center for Applied Scientific Computing at Lawrence Livermore
National Laboratory:

http://www.llnl.gov/CASC/well_log/

Dr. Gregory Greenman
Physicist
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hey there ,

Yep,of course I searched the web about this . Again I need ANIMATIONS so that my classmates would understand the physics of MRI easily .
 
Hello, I'm currently trying to compare theoretical results with an MCNP simulation. I'm using two discrete sets of data, intensity (probability) and linear attenuation coefficient, both functions of energy, to produce an attenuated energy spectrum after x-rays have passed through a thin layer of lead. I've been running through the calculations and I'm getting a higher average attenuated energy (~74 keV) than initial average energy (~33 keV). My guess is I'm doing something wrong somewhere...
Back
Top