Where Can the Electric Field Be Zero Between Point Charges?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dswatson
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Field Physics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on identifying regions where the electric field is zero between a positive charge (2q) and a negative charge (-q) separated by a distance d. Conceptually, the electric field will be zero at a point between the two charges where their opposing fields cancel each other out. Participants emphasize the importance of visual aids, such as diagrams with arrowed lines indicating field strength and direction, to clarify the concept. The initial request for a conceptual explanation highlights the need for a deeper understanding beyond mathematical calculations. Visual representations proved to be beneficial in grasping the concept effectively.
dswatson
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
A charge 2q and a charge -q sit a distance of d away from one another. In what region of space can the electric be zero? The answer has to be answered conceptually and not mathematically. Pictures would be helpful. I understand how to do the problem mathematically and that at some point between the two charges would be a spot where the E-field is zero. Can someone help me explain this? Thank you in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Draw a picture. In each region of the line passing through the charge centers and defined by the charge placements, indicate the field strength and direction for each charge with arrowed lines. Discuss.
 
gneill said:
Draw a picture. In each region of the line passing through the charge centers and defined by the charge placements, indicate the field strength and direction for each charge with arrowed lines. Discuss.

ok just drawing a picture with the arrowed lines was a huge help thank you
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top