Where did this 1/4*ln(C) term come from when integrating?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dchau503
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integrating Term
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the integration of a given equation involving logarithmic terms. The original poster is trying to understand the appearance of the term \(\frac{1}{4} \ln(c)\) in the integrated result, questioning why it is presented in that form rather than simply as a constant of integration.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the nature of the constant of integration, discussing its representation and implications for solving the equation. Questions arise about the legitimacy of using different forms of constants, such as \(\frac{1}{8} \ln(c)\) or \(3\ln(c)\), and the reasoning behind the specific choice of \(\frac{1}{4} \ln(c)\).

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights into the flexibility of constants in integration and encouraging exploration of different forms. There is no explicit consensus yet, as some participants remain confused about the rationale behind the chosen form of the constant.

Contextual Notes

Participants are considering the implications of the constant of integration in the context of solving for \(u\) and how different representations may affect the solution process. The original poster's confusion highlights the need for clarity on the assumptions made regarding constants in integration.

dchau503
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The givenequation is this: <br /> \frac{1}{4} \frac {du}{(2-u)} \ + \ \frac{1}{4} \frac{du}{(2+u)} \ = \frac{dx}{x}
My book says that when integrated, the above equation becomes <br /> \frac{-1}{4} \ln (2-u) \ + \ \frac{1}{4} \ln (2+u) \ = \ln (x) + \frac{1}{4} \ln (c)

I understand everything except for the final term of the last equation. where did the \frac{1}{4} \ln (c) come from and shouldn't it just be c as the constant of integration?

Homework Equations


\frac{1}{4} \frac {du}{(2-u)} \ + \ \frac{1}{4} \frac{du}{(2+u)} \ = \frac{dx}{x}
\frac{-1}{4} \ln (2-u) \ + \ \frac{1}{4} \ln (2+u) \ = \ln (x) + \frac{1}{4} \ln (c)



The Attempt at a Solution



Integrating \frac{dx}{x} gives you \ln(x) + c.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
\frac14 \ln c is an arbitrary constant. Presumably writing it in that form rather than as D makes solving for u much more convenient.

If f: U \to \mathbb{R} is a surjection, then it is perfectly legitimate to take f(C) for some C \in U \subset \mathbb{R} as a constant of integration rather than D \in \mathbb{R}.
 
So then any term as the constant would make sense? E.g. the book could've used \frac{1}{8} \ln(c) \text{or}\ 3\ln(c) as the last term in the integrated equation? I'm just a little confused how they got \frac{1}{4} \ln(c).
 
Try using a plain old ##c## for the arbitrary constant and solve for ##u##. What happens then if you replace ##c## with ##\frac 14 \ln c##? You should, I hope, see why that form was chosen.
 
I got that u = \frac{2cx^4-2}{1+cx^4}. I still don't see why the form was chosen.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
11K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K