Where did this term go? - Help with Example Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fjolvar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Example Term
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the elimination of a term in an equation involving exponential functions, specifically in the context of Equation 2.12 and its derivative. The term in question is not cancelled but is instead re-expressed using the product rule of differentiation, as demonstrated by the equation \(\frac{d}{dt} \left[ f(t)g(t) \right] = \frac{df}{dt}g(t)+\frac{dg}{dt}f(t)\). The participant clarifies that understanding this transformation is crucial for correctly interpreting the relationship between the left-hand side and the right-hand side of the equation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of exponential functions and their properties
  • Familiarity with differentiation and the product rule in calculus
  • Knowledge of mathematical notation and terminology
  • Ability to interpret and manipulate equations in mathematical contexts
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the product rule of differentiation in calculus
  • Review properties of exponential functions in detail
  • Explore examples of rewriting equations using derivatives
  • Practice solving problems involving exponential equations and their derivatives
USEFUL FOR

Students studying calculus, educators teaching mathematics, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of exponential functions and differentiation techniques.

Fjolvar
Messages
156
Reaction score
0
I'm having trouble figuring out how the term below boxed in red was eliminated on the left side of the equation as shown below. I reviewed properties of exponential functions, and still can't understand how this term was cancelled.

1. Homework Statement

zwx94z.jpg


Homework Equations


Exponential laws

The Attempt at a Solution


Well e^(a/b) = b root of e^a which is not the case here. I'm not sure how else this term can be written so that it cancels with the tau c below it in the denominator.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The important equation is 2.12

The term you're referring to isn't "cancelled", but Eq 2.13 is merely stating that the LHS can be rewritten in terms of the derivative of a product.

[tex] \frac{d}{dt} \left[ f(t)g(t) \right] = \frac{df}{dt}g(t)+\frac{dg}{dt}f(t)[/tex]
If you take the derivative of that product, using the product rule above, then you recover the terms.
[tex] \frac{d}{dt} \left[ h(t) e^{t/{\tau_c}} \right] = \frac{dh}{dt} e^{t/{\tau_c}} + h(t) \frac{d}{dt} \left[ e^{t/{\tau_c}} \right][/tex]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K