Where do these constants in equations come from?

  • Thread starter Thread starter SticksandStones
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Constants
AI Thread Summary
Physicists and mathematicians derive equations with integer and fractional constants through foundational principles and dimensional analysis. For instance, the constant "3" in the mean-square-speed equation arises from the three-dimensional nature of space, while "0.5" in the kinetic energy formula comes from the integration of velocity in the context of work and Newton's Second Law. These constants often appear intuitive once the derivations are understood, revealing their non-arbitrary nature. However, not all constants are integers; examples like the golden ratio and pi illustrate the presence of irrational numbers in scientific equations. Overall, the discovery of these constants is rooted in both theoretical derivation and empirical convenience.
SticksandStones
Messages
88
Reaction score
0
Something I've always wondered: how did Physicists and Mathematicians of years past discover equations with these integer (and even fraction) constants in them?

Take for example the mean-square-speed equation:
\mu \equiv \sqrt{\frac{3RT}{M_{m}}}

or Kinetic Energy:
\frac{1}{2}mv^{2}
How do they discover this 3 and .5? It seems arbitrary.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
SticksandStones said:
Something I've always wondered: how did Physicists and Mathematicians of years past discover equations with these integer (and even fraction) constants in them?

Take for example the mean-square-speed equation:
\mu \equiv \sqrt{\frac{3RT}{M_{m}}}

or Kinetic Energy:
\frac{1}{2}mv^{2}
How do they discover this 3 and .5? It seems arbitrary.
This 3 comes from dimensionality of space... which plays a role in the statistical treatment of the ideal gas law.
This .5 comes from the integral of v dv, which arises from the definition of work and Newton's Second Law.

These relations are derived from first principles...
 
Last edited:
The integer and even fraction constants are usually pretty apparent when you go through a derivation.
 
SticksandStones said:
Something I've always wondered: how did Physicists and Mathematicians of years past discover equations with these integer (and even fraction) constants in them?

Take for example the mean-square-speed equation:
\mu \equiv \sqrt{\frac{3RT}{M_{m}}}

or Kinetic Energy:
\frac{1}{2}mv^{2}
How do they discover this 3 and .5? It seems arbitrary.

Hyperphysics is one good site to explore some of these questions, e.g.

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/kinetic/kintem.html
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/kinetic/molke.html
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/kinetic/maxspe.html
 
Thanks for the links Astronuc.

Something I forgot to leave out of my original post is my surprise at how often it turns out to be an integer (or simple fraction) that it is multiplied by.
Although I guess going through and deriving it shows why.
 
SticksandStones said:
Thanks for the links Astronuc.

Something I forgot to leave out of my original post is my surprise at how often it turns out to be an integer (or simple fraction) that it is multiplied by.
Although I guess going through and deriving it shows why.

When it comes to empirical investigation of constants, remember that, say, 100000000000000000000/100000000000000000001, is pretty close to 1. It is convenience to choose one; and the fact that there is no measurable difference.
 
its not ALWAYS an integer... A famous number for example is the golden ratio, which is like (1+sqr(5))/2 ~= 1.62
Or... number pi? Area of Circle = pi*r^2 ?
Many times in formulas you have square roots of things, which are irrational numbers... there are PLENTY of examples where the constants are not integers.
 
Back
Top