Where Does a Man Land When Jumping Inside a Moving Train?

  • Thread starter Thread starter sero
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
When a man jumps straight up inside a moving train, he initially shares the train's forward momentum, allowing him to land back in the same spot due to Newton's first law of motion. However, air resistance affects his jump, causing him to lose some forward speed. As a result, he will land slightly behind his original position, potentially by an inch or so. The discussion emphasizes that in a closed boxcar, the air moves with the train, which could mitigate the effect of air resistance. Ultimately, while he aims to jump vertically, external factors like air resistance can influence the final landing position.
sero
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
If a train is going 35 mph and there's a dude standing in a boxcar and he jumps 2 feet in the air, where will he land? In the same spot, or ahead of or behind the spot he jumped from?

currently some friends and I are debating this. some say the same spot some say behind. I say the same spot due to Newtons 1st law of motion, and general relativity.

1. what is the anwser
2. what is the equation to solve it ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Originally posted by sero
1. what is the anwser
If he jumps straight up, he will fall straight down...landing on the same spot in the boxcar.
2. what is the equation to solve it ?
No equations needed, but if you insist, the horizontal distance the jumper travels is:
d=v_0t
This formula works in the frame of the ground or the boxcar. From the boxcar's viewpoint, v_0 = 0; from the viewpoint of someone on the ground, v_0 = 35{mph}, the same speed as the boxcar itself.
 
cont

thanks Doc :smile:
 
Well there is a caveat. Before the guy jumps he's at rest with respect to the train. This means he shares the same forward speed the train does, relative to the ground, and has a forward momentum of his mass times that speed. When he jumps straight up, his momentum - and therefore his forward velocity - would be conserved if there was no air. And in that case he would still have the same speed as the train and would come down where he started.

But there is air resistance; some of his momentum is transferred to the air, and he loses a litle speed. So when he comes down he hasn't moved quite as far ahead relative to the ground as the train has, and he lands just a little behind his starting spot. Maybe only an inch or to, but iot would be measurable.

I don't think we need to consider coriolis force. Imagine the train is at the equator.
 
Originally posted by selfAdjoint
Well there is a caveat. ... When he jumps straight up, his momentum - and therefore his forward velocity - would be conserved if there was no air.
It's a boxcar, not a flatcar. :smile: Assume it's closed and the air is carried along.
 
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
Back
Top