Where Does Ball Lose Contact on Ramp?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining where a ball loses contact with a smooth ramp that curves upwards. It highlights that, assuming no friction, the ball will lose contact between points B and A, following a parabolic trajectory before re-colliding with the track. To find the exact point of loss of contact, one should analyze the balance between the gravitational force and the required centripetal force, using the angle α to describe the ball's position on a circular path. The derived condition indicates that the angle α must be less than 42 degrees for the ball to maintain contact. This analysis combines principles of conservation of energy and dynamics to reach a conclusion about the ball's motion.
sfsy1
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
A ball is rolled down a smooth ramp, that curls upwards.
Where will the ball lose contact with the surface?

According to the conservation of energy law, the ball is able to reach its original height, which means the ball should stop at A. However, after the ball passes point B, won't the normal contact force be acting downwards on the ball? I'm unsure whether this will affect the point where the ball loses contact.

Also, I've tried using Normal force \leq 0 to determine the position where the ball loses contact, but i don't seem to be getting anywhere.

[PLAIN]http://img15.imageshack.us/img15/4441/17201057.gif

Am I approaching it the correct method by using the normal force, if not what will be more appropriate for this question? Many thanks in advance!


---
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Assuming no friction then the ball will lose contact somewhere between B and A. It will then follow a parabolic trajectory that will at some point re-collide with the track.

To find where the ball first loses contact you should try to find where the normal (to the curve) component of gravity first exceeds the required centripetal force.
 
Let's suppose that the curved line is a circle of radius R. Use an angle \alpha to describe the position of the ball on the circle, so that the point B is \alpha=0 and point A is \alpha=\pi/2. Conservation of energy says

\frac{v^2}{2}+gR\sin\alpha=gR

(we suppose the ball starts at rest). We derive the centripetal force

\frac{mv^2}{R}=2mg(1-\sin\alpha)

The component of the gratitational force normal to the trajectory is

mg\sin\alpha

Now we write F=ma:

mg\sin\alpha+T=2mg(1-\sin\alpha)

where T is the reaction of the circle on the ball (inwards going). Since T can only be positive, we have

3\sin\alpha<2

That is \alpha < 42 degrees (almost half way between B and A).
 
thanks, very detailed workings.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top