Where does charge go in this van de Graaff generator?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the operation of a van de Graaff generator, specifically how it draws electrons and maintains charge separation. The bottom brush is given a positive voltage to attract electrons from the belt, which then accumulate on the metal sphere, effectively creating a capacitor-like system. It is noted that there is no electric field inside the sphere, as the free charge redistributes to cancel any internal field. The conversation also touches on the necessity of a grounding mechanism for the generator to function properly, suggesting that without a ground, the device may not operate effectively. Overall, the principles of charge concentration and the role of the brushes in facilitating charge transfer are key points of the discussion.
uby
Messages
172
Reaction score
0
Sorry, I had a long post that just got eaten by my computer so I am having to re-type my question. It will need to be brief:

Here is an example of a van de Graaff generator: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/vandeg.html

It notes that the bottom brush is "given a positive voltage to draw electrons off the belt". I have no idea what this means. How is it given a voltage? A positive voltage relative to what? If it is drawing off electrons, where do these electrons go? Electroneutrality would require that all those electrons drawn ultimately from the metal sphere need to go somewhere. Where is this mythical negatively charged object?

This arrangement ultimately seems like a capacitor to me. Whether by pulleys or by an external power supply, work is inputted into the system to re-arrange electrons. The metal sphere that is positively charged and the mythical negatively charged object create an air-gap capacitor with the energy of the electric field between them maintaining charge separation. This is why electrostatic generators are high voltage: they have such low capacitances! But why then, can charge move all over the metal sphere uniformly, when it should be concentrated in the region of the electric field?

thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
On the second part of your question . There is No electric field inside the sphere created from the charge on the sphere. There might be a small E-field from the free charge that is getting thrown onto the sphere by the belt. The free charge on the metal sphere moves around to cancel the E field inside the conductor.
 
uby said:
Sorry, I had a long post that just got eaten by my computer so I am having to re-type my question. It will need to be brief:

Here is an example of a van de Graaff generator: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/vandeg.html

It notes that the bottom brush is "given a positive voltage to draw electrons off the belt". I have no idea what this means. How is it given a voltage? A positive voltage relative to what? If it is drawing off electrons, where do these electrons go? Electroneutrality would require that all those electrons drawn ultimately from the metal sphere need to go somewhere. Where is this mythical negatively charged object?

This arrangement ultimately seems like a capacitor to me. Whether by pulleys or by an external power supply, work is inputted into the system to re-arrange electrons. The metal sphere that is positively charged and the mythical negatively charged object create an air-gap capacitor with the energy of the electric field between them maintaining charge separation. This is why electrostatic generators are high voltage: they have such low capacitances! But why then, can charge move all over the metal sphere uniformly, when it should be concentrated in the region of the electric field?

thanks!

The old Van Der Graff works on one very interesting principle, that is charge - electrons - will concentrate
on geometrically sharp parts of a conductor. You're right the thing does act as a capacitor, its the brushes
that allow this. You see because they are pointed charge builds up on them and acts as a kind of barrier.
When the brushes pick up a few electrons from the belt, by mechanical action, when they get past this
barrier they are trapped on the metal sphere behind it and can build up as a big reservoir of charge.

That make sense to you nga?
 
cragar said:
On the second part of your question . There is No electric field inside the sphere created from the charge on the sphere. There might be a small E-field from the free charge that is getting thrown onto the sphere by the belt. The free charge on the metal sphere moves around to cancel the E field inside the conductor.

Pursuing the capacitor analogy, I guess if the electrons are going to ground then the other hypothetical negative charged surface can be taken to be symmetric with infinite radius? That is the only way to obtain a symmetric charge distribution in the presence of an electric field.
 
bonker said:
The old Van Der Graff works on one very interesting principle, that is charge - electrons - will concentrate
on geometrically sharp parts of a conductor. You're right the thing does act as a capacitor, its the brushes
that allow this. You see because they are pointed charge builds up on them and acts as a kind of barrier.
When the brushes pick up a few electrons from the belt, by mechanical action, when they get past this
barrier they are trapped on the metal sphere behind it and can build up as a big reservoir of charge.

That make sense to you nga?

I'm ok with the mechanism for how charge transfers onto the sphere. My problem is with the 'circuit'. In this example, the electrons aren't going to ground, they are going to some unseen external circuit. If, for example, there is no ground as an electron sink (for example, using an internal junction for ground instead), I suspect that this device would not operate.
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top