Where Does the Block Come to Rest After Launching from a Spring?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jesuslovesu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force Work
AI Thread Summary
The problem involves a .190 kg block compressing a spring with a spring constant of 200 N/m, launching horizontally on a frictionless surface, then encountering a frictional zone with a coefficient of friction of .27. The potential energy stored in the spring is calculated to be 2.25 J, while the work done by friction over an 85 cm distance is approximately .427 J. After accounting for the energy lost to friction, the block has 1.82 J remaining, which can be converted to height using mgh. The discussion suggests that without knowing the curvature of the rise, expressing the final resting position in terms of height is a valid approach. The conversation emphasizes that further calculations regarding the curve may not significantly enhance the understanding of the underlying physics concepts.
jesuslovesu
Messages
185
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A .190 kg block is compressing a spring k = 200 N/m for a dist. of .15m. The spring is mounted horizontally and the surface directly under it is frictionless. But beyond the equilibrium position of the spring end, the surface has a coefficient of friction u = .27. The frictional surface extends 85 cm, followed by a frictionless curved rise. After launch where does the block finally come to rest. MEasure from the left end of the frictional zone.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


Well the first thing I do is find the PE of the spring. PE = .5 k x^2 = 2.25 J
Secondly, I figure out the Work caused the by the frictional patch. W = .190*g*.27*.85 = .427329 J

Then I subtract them 1.82 J and this is where I get stuck, since I don't know the curvature of the curve, how am I supposed to figure out when it comes to rest? I can figure out the velocity at the end of the patch and I can also figure out the height from mgh = 1.82J, but that still doesn't take into account the curve... I've also thought about trying kinematic equations, but that doesn't seem to work either.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Perhaps you are answering your own question, in that you can determine the height above the flat plane the block would rising using mgh. Without any additional information regarding the curve I think that answer would suffice.
 
Hello,

I didn't run through your numbers, so not sure if they're accurate or not, but I wanted to say that seeing as you don't know how curved the curved rise is, I think its perfectly acceptable to express your answer in terms of height off of the ground. You could go further, and assume a constant curvature, and calculate the distance based on the radius of curvature or whatever, but I don't really see how that's any more rigorous or accurate than expressing it as height off of the ground.

But I don't know your teacher, so YMMV :P That kind of ancillary calculation after the fact seems immaterial to the physics concepts being asked here, IMHO.
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top