Where does the formula for dtheta in polar coordinates come from?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Moose352
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The formula for dtheta in polar coordinates is derived using the relationships x = r cos(theta) and y = r sin(theta). By differentiating these expressions, one can express theta as a function of x and y. The derivation involves calculating the changes in angle (delta theta) resulting from small changes in x and y, forming right triangles to relate these changes to the radius r. The discussion emphasizes that a positive change in x results in a negative change in theta, leading to the formula dtheta = (x dy - y dx) / (x^2 + y^2). Visual aids can enhance understanding, particularly in illustrating the relationships between the segments and angles involved.
Moose352
Messages
165
Reaction score
0
For this diagram: http://ananth.ath.cx/coag.jpg

The textbook gives the formula for dtheta as (x*dy-y*dx) / (x^2 + y^2) assuming that r' ~ r. How is this formula derived?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The easiest way is to use polar coordinates:

x = r \cos \theta
y = r \sin \theta

From these you can express theta as a function of x and y, and then differentiate both sides of the equation. You can also find this formula directly from the diagram by first calculating the \Delta \theta_1 that arises from \Delta x, and then \Delta \theta_2 that arises from \Delta y. The add them to get \Delta \theta. Note that a positive delta x decreases the angle (\Delta \theta_1 is negative). But in the diagram delta x looks (slightly?) negative.
 
Last edited:
Thanks PBRMEASAP!

But I'm a bit confused by the second part. You write that i can simply add theta1 and theta2 together to find theta. How exactly do I find the theta1 and theta2 that arise from dx and dy?
 
Well, it's hard to describe without a visual aid, but I don't know how to put up a picture that isn't too large a file (I tried to post something I drew in Paint one time and it wouldn't take it).

For the delta x part, draw a picture where r' only differs from r by a small delta x (delta y = 0). Draw the little segment of length delta x that connects the end of r to end of r'. Now draw another small segment from the end of r so that it intersects r' at 90 deg. You now have formed a little right triangle with delta x as the hypotenuse. And the length of that last little segment you drew is r \Delta \theta (approximately).

Now here's the trick. Say that r makes an angle theta (not delta theta) with the x-axis. Then so does r', approximately, since it only differs from r by a small x displacement. Then by alternate interior angles, r' makes an angle theta with the little delta x segment (still with me? :-)). Now you can see that the segment of length r \Delta \theta is equal in magnitude to \Delta x \ \sin \theta. Looking at the picture, you can see that the sign of delta theta is negative, so we get

\Delta \theta = -\frac{\Delta x \sin \theta}{r} = -\frac{y \Delta x}{r^2}

The contribution from delta y is found the same way. Were you able to get the answer from polar coordinates?
 
Last edited:
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top