Where Does the Momentum of a Rolling Ball Go?

  • Thread starter Thread starter member 529879
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Friction Momentum
AI Thread Summary
A heavy rolling ball stops due to friction, raising the question of where its momentum goes. The momentum is not lost but rather transferred, causing a minuscule movement of the Earth. This movement is countered by the initial force used to start the ball rolling, suggesting that momentum is conserved overall. While friction alters the ball's momentum, it does not result in a net loss like kinetic energy does. Ultimately, momentum is conserved in all interactions, including those involving friction.
member 529879
If a heavy ball is rolling on a surface, it eventually stops due to the frictional force. Where does the momentum of that ball go? Is it lost to heat, or does it maybe cause the Earth to move a very small and unnoticeable amount?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It causes the Earth to move a very small and unnoticeable amount. But you had to have moved the Earth a small and unnoticeable amount when you started the ball rolling so, this should just cancel that out roughly (the center of mass has shifted by a little bit in the process).
 
  • Like
Likes member 529879
So is momentum not lost to friction in the same way that kinetic energy is?
 
Scheuerf said:
So is momentum not lost to friction in the same way that kinetic energy is?

Friction is a force and as such changes the momentum of the ball. But Newton's 3rd law says every force has an equal and opposite reaction force so that momentum is conserved. You could perhaps lose a little bit of momentum to pieces of the ground chipping or to the surrounding air or something, but you would probably just lump those elements together into "Earth".
 
  • Like
Likes member 529879
Scheuerf said:
So is momentum not lost to friction in the same way that kinetic energy is?

No. Momentum is always conserved in any type of collision.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top