Where Should the Standard Solution Go in an Acid-Base Titration?

AI Thread Summary
In acid-base titrations, the standard solution of known concentration is typically placed in the buret, while the solution with unknown concentration is in the Erlenmeyer flask. This setup allows for better visibility of the color change, as indicators often show a color change when transitioning from acidic to basic conditions. While some argue that placing the known solution in the flask could enhance accuracy due to more precise pipetting, the overall accuracy still depends on the buret measurement. The term "titrant" generally refers to the solution in the buret, which is the standard solution used to determine the concentration of the unknown. Ultimately, the common practice is to keep the known solution in the buret for consistency and clarity in titration results.
jumbogala
Messages
414
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


Hi everyone. I'm teaching introductory chemistry this semester, but I don't have much of a chem background.

We are about to start acid base titrations. Does the standard solution of known concentration go in the buret tube or the erlenmeyer flask? Does it matter?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


In my lab, the acid has the unknown concentration, while the base's concentration is known. I have it set up so that the acid is in the erlenmeyer flask and the base is in the buret tube.

This is convenient because the indicator is colorless in the acid but pink in the base. However, would there ever be a situation where solution with the known concentration would be in the erlenmeyer flask?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I have always put known into the burette. Not that I don't know any serious arguments telling why we should do it this way.
 
Last edited:
Good to know, thank you! One more thing - is "titrant" always the solution of known concentration, or just the name for the solution that goes in the buret? It's hard to find a clear answer online.
 
Other things being equal I would put the standard in the flask. Because the pipettes sampling will be more accurate than the burette measurement I prefer the feeling that there is one thing there that I know as accurately as possible against which I am measuring my unknown. But it is ridiculous of me, because the final accuracy will just depend on then,east accurate part - then burette. Nothing to choose really.

Your point is more important - you are likely to detect a colour appearance better than its disappearance.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top