Lingusitics How do babies develop language skills?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Vance
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Language
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the origins of language and the innate ability humans have to understand each other despite speaking different languages. Noam Chomsky's theories are referenced, particularly his idea that a grammar engine in the brain allows individuals to reconstruct their native language during childhood. Recently, Chomsky has suggested that only recursion may be hardwired in the brain, which could be sufficient for language acquisition. Observations of language development in babies highlight commonalities in nonverbal communication, such as pointing and associating actions with specific cues, regardless of their parents' languages. The importance of tone and inflection in conveying meaning is emphasized, as even babbling can carry emotional context. Personal anecdotes about twins developing their own form of communication further illustrate the fascinating nature of language development and understanding.
Vance
Messages
180
Reaction score
0
Can you tell me about it ?
Where does it come from ? Why do we understand each other though we speak different languages ?

Thanks in advance
 
Science news on Phys.org
vance think now you are all free right ?
So vance make this question, please help...

Thanks
 
Where does it come from ?
Where does it come from ?
Where does it come from ?
Where does it come from ?
 
Well notably Chomsky said that we have a grammar engine somewhere in our brains that at a sufficiently abstract level enables each of us to reconstruct internally in childhood the language spoken about us. Recently Chomsky has conjectured that instead of the complex generative grammar facilities which have long been associiated with his theory, only recursion is hardwired in the human brain. He feels that is sufficient for each individual to reconstruct his home language in order to understand and speak it.
 
Well, from recently being in the presence of many babies in the newborn to 2 year old range (we have had a real baby-boom lately!), I've been fascinated by their language development. One thing I've really noticed is that some things are common among all of them, even if their parents speak different languages at home. One of those is the nonverbal language...pointing to things, associating different actions with one another (for example, my friend's daughter gets her hat when she wants to go outside because she has associated going outside with her mom putting a hat on her). The other thing I've noticed is that long before the baby babble becomes coherent words (at least to those of us not fluent in baby babble), the tones and inflections of speech develop. It is the most bizarre thing to listen to a kid babbling and it sounds like they really just said a sentence, just in a foreign language or something, and yet it was all just babble. Intonation conveys a lot of meaning (something seriously lost on the internet in written word). I've noticed this when around people speaking languages I'm not as fluent in. Even if I don't understand the words, I know when they are telling a joke, or asking a question, just by the way they speak, not by the words used. I have cousins who are twins and my mom and aunts all tell me that they had their own language when younger. The two of them would talk to each other in babble nobody else understood, but it seemed they understood each other quite well. I think language development is incredibly fascinating, but I don't know much about it other than what I've witnessed in babies.
 
There is a neighboring thread Cover songs versus the original track, which ones are better? https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/cover-songs-versus-the-original-track-which-ones-are-better.1050205/ which is an endless subject and as colorful are the posts there. I came across a Buddy Holly cover by Eva Cassidy only to find out that the Buddy Holly song was already a Paul Anka cover. Anyway, both artists who had covered the song have passed far too early in their lives. That gave me the...
The piece came-up from the "Lame Jokes" section of the forum. Someobody carried a step from one of the posts and I became curious and tried a brief web search. A web page gives some justification of sorts why we can use goose(s)-geese(p), but not moose(s)-meese(p). Look for the part of the page headed with "Why isn't "meese" the correct plural?" https://languagetool.org/insights/post/plural-of-moose/

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
112
Views
8K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
64
Views
15K
Back
Top