Where to place a third charge so it experiences no force

AI Thread Summary
To find the position for a third charge that experiences no net force between two existing charges, the forces exerted by both charges must balance. The equation derived is q1/r^2 = -q2/(r - d)^2, where q1 is the positive charge and q2 is the negative charge. It is crucial to note that the third charge cannot be placed between the two existing charges due to opposing forces acting on it. A correction was made regarding the negative sign in the equation, emphasizing the need to account for the nature of the charges. The discussion highlights the importance of correctly applying the principles of electrostatics to solve the problem.
alxkrgr
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A point charge of 5.6 microcoulombs is placed at the origin (x=0) of a coordinate system, and another charge of -1.9 microcouloumbs is placed on the x-axis at .29m. Where on the axis can a third charge be placed so that it experiences no charge?

q1= 5.6 E-6
q2= -1.9 E-6
d= .29m

Homework Equations


F= k*(q1*q2)/r^2

The Attempt at a Solution


Fnet = F1,3 + F2,3
Fnet = 0
F1,3 = -(F2,3)
k*(q1*q3)/r^2 =k*(q2*q3)/(r-distance)^2
i know the k and q3 variables cancel out so i get
q1/r^2 = q2/(r-distance)^2

after i get this far I can't seem to get a correct answer. any help would be greatly appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Shouldn't the distance from the second charge be (.29 - r) where r is the distance from the origin?
 
J Hann said:
Shouldn't the distance from the second charge be (.29 - r) where r is the distance from the origin?

Yes, I accidentally reversed it in my post. Thanks for pointing that out.
 
Also, remember that the third (test) charge cannot be between the first two charges because one charge will
attract the test charge and one charge will repel the test charge.
 
J Hann said:
Also, remember that the third (test) charge cannot be between the first two charges because one charge will
attract the test charge and one charge will repel the test charge.

so should the charge on q2 be q2/(.29 PLUS r)?
 
alxkrgr said:

Homework Statement


A point charge of 5.6 microcoulombs is placed at the origin (x=0) of a coordinate system, and another charge of -1.9 microcouloumbs is placed on the x-axis at .29m. Where on the axis can a third charge be placed so that it experiences no charge force?

q1= 5.6 E-6
q2= -1.9 E-6
d= .29m

Homework Equations


F= k*(q1*q2)/r^2

The Attempt at a Solution


Fnet = F1,3 + F2,3
Fnet = 0
F1,3 = -(F2,3)
k*(q1*q3)/r^2 =k*(q2*q3)/(r-distance)^2
i know the k and q3 variables cancel out so i get
q1/r^2 = q2/(r-distance)^2

after i get this far I can't seem to get a correct answer. any help would be greatly appreciated!
You have typo which I have indicated above.

Your equation, q1/r2 = q2/(r - d)2 is missing a negative sign. (Remember, q2 is itself negative.)

That makes it q1/r2 = -q2/(r - d)2 .

Take the square root of both sides remembering to use a ± on one side or the other. Solve for r .

alxkrgr said:
so should the charge on q2 be q2/(.29 PLUS r)?
That does not make sense. Did you mean "Should q3 be q2/(.29 + r) " ?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top