Whether or not infidecimal numbers existed

  • Thread starter Thread starter JonF
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Numbers
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the existence of infinitesimal numbers, which are defined as non-zero numbers so small that their product with any finite number remains less than one. Historically, mathematicians like Leibniz treated infinitesimals as valid numbers without proving their existence, leading to their rejection in the 19th century. However, in the 20th century, Abraham Robinson developed a rigorous theory of non-standard analysis that includes infinitesimals and transfinite numbers, allowing for their practical use in mathematics. Despite their historical controversy, infinitesimals are still considered useful conceptual tools in fields like physics, although they are often dismissed in modern calculus education. The ongoing exploration of infinitesimals highlights the evolving nature of mathematical understanding.
JonF
Messages
621
Reaction score
1
I’m reading this book on math history, and its pretty interesting.

There is this one part where the book goes into two mathematicians (sorry forgot which two) that argued about whether or not infidecimal numbers existed. The book said whether or not they do exist wasn’t proved till much later in history, but it never told if they did or didn’t exist! So do infidecimal numbers exist?

If I remember correctly the definition of a infidecimal number is:

A number that is not Zero.
A number that is so small, that when it is multiplied by any finite number their product will never be a number greater then one.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Perhaps you mean infinitesimal?

This is not a feature of the Real Number system.
 
What do you mean by "exist"?

As Integral mentions, there are no infinitessimals in any of the standard number systems (such as integers, rationals, reals)

Using abstract algebra, it's a simple exercise to make a new ordered field (a "number system" with +, -, *, /, and <) by adding a number to the real numbers which is decreed to be infinitessimal.

With some tough mathematics, one can arrive at non-standard analysis which can often "enlarge" things to include transfinite and infinitessimal numbers in a practical way. (But in some sense, this is no more powerful than doing things the ordinary way)
 
In the seventeenth century, Leibnitz treated differentials as if they were infinitesimal and represented bonafide numbers. But he offered no proof of their existence.

bio - Gottfried Wilhelm von Leibnitz --->
http://www-history.mcs.st-andrews.ac.uk/history/Mathematicians/Leibniz.html

By the middle of the nineteenth century the idea of infinitesimals was effectively squelched by mathematicians as unreal and unnecessary.

By the second half of the twentieth century, Abbie Robinson presented a rigorous theory of extended numbers containing regular real numbers, infinitesmals and transfinite numbers too. If x is an infinitesimal number not zero, then 1/x must be a transfinite number (larger than any regular real numbers).

bio - Abraham Robinson --->
http://www-history.mcs.st-andrews.ac.uk/history/Mathematicians/Robinson.html

So far, Robinson's theory has been used to find out general facts in the extended number system and translate those facts back into ordinary standard real numbers. A complete theory that deals with this extension as a unique and definite system of its own has eluded researchers.
 
Hm, funny. At my university the mathematicians scoff at the physicists for using the term infinitissimal at all, because it is "archaic". True enough, it is out of style in the way calculus is taught these days, but it is a handy conceptual tool in physics (so that if you have a dV you think of it is as an itsibitsi piece of volume...)
 
The Robinson theory is usually called Non-Standard Analysis. Here is a summary of the essentials of the subject, including a list of mathematicians and other specialists interested in it.

Phillip Apps: What is NonStandard Analysis? --->
http://members.tripod.com/PhilipApps/nonstandard.html

Quart
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top