Which Advanced Mathematical Physics Books Should I Read?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on finding a suitable advanced mathematics book for understanding quantum mechanics and general relativity. Participants recommend "A Course in Modern Mathematical Physics: Groups, Hilbert Space and Differential Geometry" by Peter Szekeres as an ideal resource, noting its comprehensive coverage of relevant mathematical concepts. There is a consensus that Arfken's book, while useful for problem-solving, lacks the depth needed for formal mathematical understanding and is more of a reference guide than a textbook. Other suggestions include caution against using Arfken and mention of Frankel's work, which is deemed less relevant due to its focus on geometry. Overall, Szekeres is highlighted as the most fitting choice for the original poster's needs.
Boltzmann2012
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
Hey guys, I have seen many posts on the same topic but I was unable to come to a coherent conclusion. I have seen people reffering to Arfken or Mary Boas.
I have sufficient knowledge in linear algebra, statistics and calculus in many variables. I am presently taking a course in complex analysis. I would like to know if there is any book on a slightly higher footing which would help me understand the advanced math in quantum mechanics and general relativity.

Regards
Boltzmann 2012
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It looks like this book is a good fit to you:

Peter Szekeres - A Course in Modern Mathematical Physics: Groups, Hilbert Space and Differential Geometry
https://www.amazon.com/dp/0521829607/?tag=pfamazon01-20

I'm currently studying this book. It covers the mathematics for both quantum mechanics and general relativity.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Huqinpku said:
It looks like this book is a good fit to you:

Peter Szekeres - A Course in Modern Mathematical Physics: Groups, Hilbert Space and Differential Geometry
https://www.amazon.com/dp/0521829607/?tag=pfamazon01-20

I'm currently studying this book. It covers the mathematics for both quantum mechanics and general relativity.

I second this reccomendation, it's a very nice book. Stay away from Arfken!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Arfken is very good but it's not what I consider a 'mathematical physics' textbook. It's a cookbook for solving problems, not learning the math necessary for formalism.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
While Frankel is interesting (I recently checked it out from my library),
it is focused on "Geometry" [as its title suggests].
I think Szekeres would be more appropriate for the OP.
 
The book is fascinating. If your education includes a typical math degree curriculum, with Lebesgue integration, functional analysis, etc, it teaches QFT with only a passing acquaintance of ordinary QM you would get at HS. However, I would read Lenny Susskind's book on QM first. Purchased a copy straight away, but it will not arrive until the end of December; however, Scribd has a PDF I am now studying. The first part introduces distribution theory (and other related concepts), which...
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
34
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
7K
Replies
21
Views
5K
Replies
8
Views
182
Replies
20
Views
3K
Back
Top