Which Book Best Explains Relativity for University Students?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Texag
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Book
AI Thread Summary
A university student is seeking a deeper understanding of relativity, particularly after being introduced to wave equations in an Electromagnetism class. They found "A Brief History of Time" insightful but lacking in explanations of the underlying principles. Recommendations for books that provide a more comprehensive understanding include "Gravity: An Introduction to Einstein's General Relativity" by James Hartle, which is suggested for its clarity in general relativity (GR). For special relativity (SR), "Spacetime Physics" (first edition) is recommended for its problem-solving approach. Some participants express dissatisfaction with "Relativity Demystified" by David McMahon, citing errors and insufficient depth. The discussion emphasizes the importance of using university libraries to explore these texts before purchasing. Overall, the conversation highlights the need for resources that balance conceptual understanding with mathematical rigor in the study of relativity.
Texag
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Hello, I am a low level university student, and ever since my Electromagnetism class where we derived the wave equations and my professor gave us a brief sample on what implications they had on the way things are in the world, I've been trying to get a true understanding of the topic of relativity. I have picked up "Brief History of Time" and it was great, it showed the effects of everything but did not do such a good job in my opinion in explaining why. Now I know this might be a case of my brain needing that one special example to get it to click or it might need a complicated derivation of some kind. What I would like help on is finding a book that can give me an understanding of the topic, not just be able to predict its effects.

edit: i have done some looking on the internet, but I find that I cannot read extensive things off a computer screen, however printing something out to read would be a possibility.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Last edited by a moderator:
Texag,
https://www.amazon.com/dp/0521277035/?tag=pfamazon01-20 ), who seems to be local to you [based on your earlier posts and your username]. Fulling also makes reference to some notes that available at your bookstore.

I'd also suggest
which emphasize geometric reasoning with spacetime diagrams.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I went out earlier and got "Demystifying relativity" from a B&N, and I am having to detour and learn the operators used, since the physics classes I took only used the integral form of maxwell's equations. Thanks for the suggestions, I think I might have to check out the Schutz, since I'm considering a physics minor or major at A&M.
 
Texag said:
I went out earlier and got "Demystifying relativity" from a B&N, and I am having to detour and learn the operators used, since the physics classes I took only used the integral form of maxwell's equations. Thanks for the suggestions, I think I might have to check out the Schutz, since I'm considering a physics minor or major at A&M.

If you mean Relativity Demystified by David McMahon and Paul M. Alsing, I think that's a rather shallow book, more like a set of notes. I second the recommendation of Hartle for GR, though for SR I still think working through the problems in the first red paperback edition of Spacetime Physics is the best way to get a solid grounding. Rindler's books are also very good and go further with 4-vectors, though his coverage of GR is probably too eccentric for a general recommendation. Then if you want a little more of the math of SR after that, read the 2 SR chapters in Jackson.
 
Daverz said:
If you mean Relativity Demystified by David McMahon and Paul M. Alsing, I think that's a rather shallow book, more like a set of notes. I second the recommendation of Hartle for GR, though for SR I still think working through the problems in the first red paperback edition of Spacetime Physics is the best way to get a solid grounding. Rindler's books are also very good and go further with 4-vectors, though his coverage of GR is probably too eccentric for a general recommendation. Then if you want a little more of the math of SR after that, read the 2 SR chapters in Jackson.

Yes, its the one by McMahon. I read through the first chapter, and after I noticed a few mistakes (he switched current density and charge density at one point) I am deciding to try to return the book, also It only had a small review on SR, which I have yet to grasp. I will be returning to the store today with your recommendation in mind to see what I can find. Thanks.
 
Texag said:
Yes, its the one by McMahon. I read through the first chapter, and after I noticed a few mistakes (he switched current density and charge density at one point) I am deciding to try to return the book, also It only had a small review on SR, which I have yet to grasp. I will be returning to the store today with your recommendation in mind to see what I can find. Thanks.

Note that the red (or maroon as Robphy sees it) paperback 1st edition of Spacetime Physics is preferable to the second edition. It includes all the solutions for one thing, and the second edition dropped the use of rapidity for some supposed pedagogical reason.
 
Back
Top