Schools Which Canadian University Offers Better Undergraduate Physics Opportunities?

AI Thread Summary
Choosing between Waterloo's mathematical physics and Carleton's honours physics programs may not significantly impact future admissions to master's or PhD programs; grades are more critical. Research opportunities are essential for gaining experience and building connections, but the coop structure may limit time for independent research. Engaging in coop positions can still provide valuable experience. To determine which branch of physics to specialize in, exploring various subjects is crucial. Attending a university with diverse research fields can enhance exposure to different areas of physics. Maintaining strong grades can also open doors to scholarships and research projects in later years.
logomyoggos
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
I have a couple of questions about physics degrees in Canada and was hoping maybe someone could clear some things up. I've been accepted into Waterloo's mathematical physics and Carelton's honours physics, both coop.

1. Does the school I choose for my undergrad have a really big affect on admissions to a masters/phd? If not what does?
2. As an undergraduate student, how available are research opportunities and how impactful would they be?
3. What are good ways to try to decide which branches of physics to specialize in in the future? As of right now I've been reading around and feel like I could be interested and motivated in any branch.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
logomyoggos said:
1. Does the school I choose for my undergrad have a really big affect on admissions to a masters/phd? If not what does?
I don't think there would be any significant difference in having a degree from Waterloo vs Carleton. What os more important are your grades.

logomyoggos said:
2. As an undergraduate student, how available are research opportunities and how impactful would they be?
Getting a foot into the research door early can be very helpful if you wish to continue in research. It is not just the experience, but also the contacts and letters of reference (if you do a good job...). Thats said, with a coop program, you don't have much time off to be able to work in a lab, do you? I would think most of your research will be part of coop work.

logomyoggos said:
3. What are good ways to try to decide which branches of physics to specialize in in the future? As of right now I've been reading around and feel like I could be interested and motivated in any branch.
The only good way to find out if a subject will interest and motivate you is to explore it, which can be hard to do before you start your undergraduate studies. It can be worth it to go to a university that has a broader range of research fields, in order to have the possibility of being exposed to more subjects and to increase the chance of there being a professor in your field of interest when you discover what it is.
 
For 2., If your grades after 2nd year are good you might be able to get USRAs or other internal scholarships (what I did), which were also available on the coop job postings. Apart from that there are also courses you can take where you work on research projects in 3rd and 4th year. Basically if you put in a good effort to find a position you will be able to get one.
 
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
Back
Top