Which courses before GR and QFT?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the prerequisites and recommended courses for studying General Relativity (GR) and Quantum Field Theory (QFT) in a theoretical physics program. Participants share their experiences and suggest various mathematical and physics courses that may be beneficial before tackling these advanced topics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses a desire to study GR and QFT after completing courses in classical mechanics, special relativity, and quantum mechanics, questioning if their background is sufficient.
  • Another participant suggests that the prerequisites for introductory GR and QFT courses appear to be met, but emphasizes the importance of comparing curricula from different universities.
  • There is a discussion about the necessity of differential geometry, with some participants indicating that it depends on the course structure, while others note that many GR courses provide a brief introduction to it.
  • A participant mentions that undergraduate differential geometry typically covers curves and surfaces, which may aid in mathematical intuition but is not strictly necessary for GR.
  • One participant outlines a minimum prerequisite for QFT, suggesting that understanding 0-dimensional QFT and Gaussian integrals could be beneficial, along with a background in statistical mechanics for deeper comprehension.
  • Another participant notes that GR requires knowledge of classical field theory and special relativity, but asserts that many GR courses teach the necessary differential geometry concurrently.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that a background in certain mathematical and physics courses is beneficial for studying GR and QFT, but there is no consensus on the necessity of specific courses like differential geometry. Multiple competing views on prerequisites and course structures remain evident.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the variability in course requirements across different universities, which may affect the assessment of preparedness for GR and QFT. There are also differing opinions on the essential mathematical background needed, particularly regarding differential geometry.

FilipLand
Messages
52
Reaction score
3
Hi!

I will soon begin my third year at the theoretical physics program. I have done a bunch of classical & Lagrangian mechanics, SP, atomic physics, electromagnetism, and basic particle physics.

Is it a good idea to study general relativity and quantum field theory with this knowledge, what is your experience?

I will study abroad next study-year and am very tempted of attending these courses.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is your experience with quantum mechanics and special relativity?
 
Orodruin said:
What is your experience with quantum mechanics and special relativity?

I have done one basic and two continuation (semi-advanced) courses in quantum mechanics.
For SR I have done one very basic and one semi-advanced course which was imbedded in lagrangian dynamics.

Hard to bullet point all moments, but everything is on bachelor level, maybe some very small overlap on master level.
 
It sounds as if you should have the prerequisites for introductory GR and QFT courses. Of course, it is always difficult to compare curricula from different universities.

If you want a better assessment, I would try to get hold of the course descriptions and ask a professor at your current university, who should be familiar with your current level of knowledge, if what you have studied is sufficient.
 
Orodruin said:
It sounds as if you should have the prerequisites for introductory GR and QFT courses. Of course, it is always difficult to compare curricula from different universities.

If you want a better assessment, I would try to get hold of the course descriptions and ask a professor at your current university, who should be familiar with your current level of knowledge, if what you have studied is sufficient.

maybe I should ask instead, what courses do you recommend taking before GR and QFT? Is differential geometry a must for example?
 
FilipLand said:
Is differential geometry a must for example?
This depends completely on the setup of the course. Most GR courses will give a short crash course on differential geometry. Of course it helps to already know it.
 
Have you taken linear algebra?
 
At the undergrad level, differential geometry refers to the differential geometry of curves and surfaces and not the more general Riemannian (technically semi-Riemannian) geometry used in GR. The former type of course would help help with mathematical intuition, but is not necessary if you can't fit it in.
 
Mister T said:
Have you taken linear algebra?
Yes, two courses on that, I think I can get through GR and QFT with my current knowledge.
 
  • #10
Daverz said:
At the undergrad level, differential geometry refers to the differential geometry of curves and surfaces and not the more general Riemannian (technically semi-Riemannian) geometry used in GR. The former type of course would help help with mathematical intuition, but is not necessary if you can't fit it in.
Great to hear :)
 
  • #11
FilipLand said:
Great to hear :)

That said, it's a beautiful subject, one of the great triumphs of 19th Century mathematics.
 
  • #12
I think for QFT, the minimum prerequisite would be this:

upload_2018-2-8_2-31-4.png
A common mistake people make is to take QFT too early. Beyond this minimum see above, I'd say spending a few days learning 0 dimensional QFT with the path integral helps, and memorizing all forms of gaussian integrals/complex integration. Things get very messy once you start having more than 1 point particle, so it helps to understand the intuition before all the technical nightmare comes.

I personally like QFT to be understood from a statistical physics standpoint (likely because I still don't understand it very well), so I also think knowing stat mech will help once renormalization hits, but that often is a 2nd course in a QFT sequence.GR on the other hand I think has much fewer pre-requisites because most physics GR classes teaches the requisite differential geometry as you go. For GR, you need to basic classical field theory (Lagrangians, Hamiltonians), and special relativity/E&M at a level where you can push indices around comfortably.
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-2-8_2-31-4.png
    upload_2018-2-8_2-31-4.png
    33.3 KB · Views: 801

Similar threads

  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K