Which describes the magnetic flux through a section of a loop?

AI Thread Summary
Magnetic flux through a section of a loop is defined as a scalar quantity, not a vector, which is confirmed by the equation Φ = B·A. The units of magnetic flux are weber (Wb), equivalent to tesla metre squared (Tm²) or volt-seconds (V-s). The discussion emphasizes that magnetic flux does not have a direction, reinforcing its scalar nature. Understanding this concept is crucial for analyzing induced electromotive forces (emf) related to changes in magnetic flux. The clarification provided helps solidify the understanding of magnetic flux in physics.
McAfee
Messages
96
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Which describes the magnetic flux through a section of a loop?

A. It is a vector that is directed outward through the section.
B. It is a vector that is directed inward through the section.
C It is a vector that is tangent to the section.
D. It is a scalar.


Homework Equations



http://edugen.wileyplus.com/edugen/courses/crs4957/halliday9118/halliday9088c30/math/math114.gif

The Attempt at a Solution



I think the answer is D because there is no direction when solving for magnetic flux.

I just want verification, thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Now I'm thinking that the answer is A.
 
If you look up the defining calculation for the magnetic flux you should have your answer; does the calculation produce a vector or a scalar?
 
Wow. Thanks gneill. I think I know the answer.

Phi = B.A

It has SI units of the weber (Wb) which is a tesla metre squared (Tm^2) and is a scalar

Am I right?
 
McAfee said:
Wow. Thanks gneill. I think I know the answer.

Phi = B.A

It has SI units of the weber (Wb) which is a tesla metre squared (Tm^2) and is a scalar

Am I right?

Yup. Equivalent units are also V-s (Volt-second). This becomes important when you start looking for induced emf's due to rates of change of flux :smile:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top