Which Distance is Correct for a Free Falling Object?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the correct calculation of distance for a free-falling object under gravity. It clarifies that the acceleration due to gravity is 9.8 m/s², while the velocity of the object increases from 0 to 9.8 m/s over the first second. Formula 1, which uses constant velocity, incorrectly suggests a distance of 9.8 m, while Formula 2 correctly calculates the distance as 4.9 m using the average speed. The confusion arises from misunderstanding instantaneous velocity versus average velocity during the fall. Ultimately, the accurate distance fallen in the first second is 4.9 m.
arunkumarg
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I have a simple question may sound stupid for most of you:

For a free falling object v=9.8 m/sec. which of the distance traveled per sec is correct:

Formula 1:

d = vt
d = 9.8/1 = 9.8 m

Formula 2:
d = 1/2 a*t^2

acc of a free falling object is 9.8m/sec^2

d = 1/2 9.8*1^2
d = 4.9 m

This is a bit confusing.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


arunkumarg said:
For a free falling object v=9.8 m/sec.
No, the acceleration of a free falling object is 9.8 m/s^2. The velocity is not constant.

Formula 1:

d = vt
d = 9.8/1 = 9.8 m
This is incorrect as it assumes a constant velocity.

Formula 2:
d = 1/2 a*t^2

acc of a free falling object is 9.8m/sec^2

d = 1/2 9.8*1^2
d = 4.9 m
This is correct. That's the distance fallen in the first second.
 


Thanks for your reply.

When I say V = 9.8m/sec. its the instantaneous velocity (for the 1st Sec).

Hence, for the 1st sec the dist must be 9.8m.

I know I am missing the point somewhere.
 


arunkumarg said:
When I say V = 9.8m/sec. its the instantaneous velocity (for the 1st Sec).
That's the instantaneous velocity at the end of the 1st second. It starts out with zero velocity at t = 0 and ends up going 9.8 m/s at t = 1 sec.
Hence, for the 1st sec the dist must be 9.8m.
That would be true if the speed were constant for the entire second. But it's not. Since it starts from rest, the average speed during the 1st second is only 4.9 m/s.
 


Sounds good for me... Thanks pal
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top