What Are the Implications of Genetic Research on Inherited Traits?

  • Thread starter Thread starter noman.rasheed
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dna
AI Thread Summary
DNA inheritance involves receiving 50% of genetic material from each parent, but the specific genes inherited are randomly recombined, meaning traits like physical features do not directly correspond to those of either parent. Mitochondrial DNA, inherited solely from the mother, plays a regulatory role within cells but does not influence physiological traits. The inheritance of sex chromosomes determines gender, with males receiving a Y chromosome from their father and an X from their mother, while females receive two X chromosomes. Genetic traits can sometimes be traced back to parents, with certain characteristics, such as blood type and eye color, being better understood than others. Genetic research is crucial for identifying hereditary diseases, allowing for predictions about individual health risks based on ancestral genetic markers. Advances in genetics, including genome decoding, hold significant potential for future medical breakthroughs.
noman.rasheed
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
Which DNA do we inherit from both of our parents?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
You get 50% from each parent but not any specific 50%, the recombination appears to be completely random.
You don't get something like your father's feet and you mother's eyes.

In addition to DNA in the nucleus, some DNA exists in mitochondria, which are like little chemical factories in cells and are outside the nucleus.
That DNA is only inhereted from the mother, but it only functions as a regulatory mechanism for internal processes of the cell.
It is thought not to be at all involved in determining any part of a person's physiology.
 
rootone said:
You get 50% from each parent but not any specific 50%, the recombination appears to be completely random.
You don't get something like your father's feet and you mother's eyes.

In addition to DNA in the nucleus, some DNA exists in mitochondria, which are like little chemical factories in cells and are outside the nucleus.
That DNA is only inhereted from the mother, but it only functions as a regulatory mechanism for internal processes of the cell.
It is thought not to be at all involved in determining any part of a person's physiology.

If you are a boy, you got your Y chromosome from pop.
 
That's true, but it is nevertheless associated with an X chromosome which you got from your mother.
The resulting recombined 'gene', affects (probably), many different aspects of the physiological result, but you definitely will be male.
Equally though, (50% equally), it could turn out that you inherit an X chromosome from pop, then you will definitely be female.
I take your point though.
 
rootone said:
You get 50% from each parent but not any specific 50%, the recombination appears to be completely random.
You don't get something like your father's feet and you mother's eyes.

In addition to DNA in the nucleus, some DNA exists in mitochondria, which are like little chemical factories in cells and are outside the nucleus.
That DNA is only inhereted from the mother, but it only functions as a regulatory mechanism for internal processes of the cell.
It is thought not to be at all involved in determining any part of a person's physiology.

Well, the traits you inherit from your mother and father are not completely random. That was proven by this chap called Gregor Mendel, who made many experiments with cultivating pea plants:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gregor_Mendel

Studying how the genes from the mother and father combine is just one part of the science of genetics:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetics

The traits of an individual can be traced back sometimes to the traits of one or both parents. Things like blood type, eye color, etc. are somewhat understood. Other traits may be poorly understood or not understood at all.

Genetic research is also important because certain diseases, like cancer, are know to have genetic causes, so if the genetic markers for the disease can be established to be present in an individuals ancestors, then perhaps a prediction can be made of the chances of that individual developing the disease, and his condition may be monitored closely for early signs of this so treatment can begin.

A lot of this is cutting edge research, which is why things like decoding the human genome can have potentially staggering implications for future scientific breakthroughs in curing or treating diseases, among other things.
 
Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S. According to articles in the Los Angeles Times, "Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S.", and "Kissing bugs bring deadly disease to California". LA Times requires a subscription. Related article -...
I am reading Nicholas Wade's book A Troublesome Inheritance. Please let's not make this thread a critique about the merits or demerits of the book. This thread is my attempt to understanding the evidence that Natural Selection in the human genome was recent and regional. On Page 103 of A Troublesome Inheritance, Wade writes the following: "The regional nature of selection was first made evident in a genomewide scan undertaken by Jonathan Pritchard, a population geneticist at the...
Back
Top