Which formula is a better predictor for changes in arrow weight: KE or Momentum?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter bluejacket
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Momentum Standard
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around evaluating which formula—kinetic energy (KE) or momentum (MO)—is a better predictor for changes in arrow weight when using crossbows. Participants explore the implications of using these formulas to calculate resulting velocities based on varying arrow weights, acknowledging the influence of additional factors like friction.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes their approach of using KE and MO formulas to predict new velocities based on original arrow mass and velocity, noting discrepancies in results.
  • Another participant questions why the momentum would not be constant across different arrow types, suggesting that the work done by the crossbow remains unchanged.
  • A participant acknowledges that while KE was initially assumed to be constant, they recognize that momentum decreases with increased arrow mass, leading to confusion in their calculations.
  • One participant points out that if KE remains constant, an increase in arrow mass results in a decrease in velocity, which in turn affects momentum, indicating a relationship between the two concepts.
  • There is a recognition that it is not possible to have two moving bodies with different masses but the same kinetic energy and momentum, highlighting the inherent differences in the two formulas.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the constancy of kinetic energy and momentum in relation to varying arrow weights. The discussion remains unresolved regarding which formula is the better predictor, as participants explore the implications of both without reaching a consensus.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge that their calculations do not account for friction and other variables, which may affect the accuracy of their predictions. Additionally, there is a lack of clarity on the assumptions made regarding the constancy of kinetic energy and momentum across different scenarios.

bluejacket
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Ok, here's the problem. I am evaluating multiple crossbows to predict the changes caused by various arrow weights. The original arrow mass and velocities are available. I input the two formula's: KE = 1/2MV^2 and MO = MV and solve for each, and then use those results with new arrow weights to solve for the new velocities. My problem is that I get different results.

Which should prove to be the most accurate predictor and why?

I know the results will not be pure because they don't include friction and other variables, but just based on the formula's above I was expecting closer results.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Let me ask this a different way.
I know the current speed and arrow weights for several models.
Using basic mathmatical priciples I would assume I could use that info to calculate either the Kinetic energy (KE = 1.2mv^2) , or the momentum (MO = mv).
I would further assume that having solved for those values I could then use new arrow weights to back track and find the new resulting velocities.
I would think that if I use the same variables in the 2 formulas I should get the same new velocities. I do not?
Example: Original arrow mass = 425gr Original velocity = 405fps
New arrow mass = 505gr New velocity = ?

My results using the KE formula gave a new velocity of 372fps.
" " " " MO formula gave a new velocity of 341fps.

What am I missing?
 
I would assume the kinetic energy to be constant for one crossbow and different arrow types.

A crossbow applies force over a distance. I assume that this distance doesn't depend on the arrow type. And the force only depends in the current position of the arrow along this distance. So the integral of force over distance (work) is constant.

I don't quite understand why you expect the momentum to be also constant for one crossbow and different arrow types.
 
Last edited:
First off, thanks for the responce. Kinetic Energy was my first standard and I'm glad to see that echo'd as appropriate. It has been a long time since I've thought through this stuff, and I looked at the momentum formula to cross check myself. I know that momentum would go down with increased arrow mass, but I guess I just got hung up in trying to work the respective formula's forward and back with the same variables.
Anyway, I think I see my error, thanks.
 
bluejacket said:
I know that momentum would go down with increased arrow mass,
If KE is to be the same, then momentum goes up with increased arrow mass. For example: If the arrow mass is 4 times bigger, then it's velocity is only halved. Therefore the momentum doubles.

bluejacket said:
I think I see my error, thanks.
When you look at the formulas, you'll see that you cannot have two moving bodies with different masses but same kinetic energy and momentum.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 131 ·
5
Replies
131
Views
9K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K