Which ∆H Should Be Used in Chemical Equations and Potential Energy Diagrams?

AI Thread Summary
When calculating the enthalpy change (∆H) for a chemical reaction, it is important to use the ∆H per mole of the substance involved. This approach ensures consistency in your equations and aligns with standard practices in thermodynamics. To confirm the correct unit usage, writing out a proper unit formula can help clarify whether to use moles or grams, as it will show what cancels out in your calculations. Using ∆H per mole is the recommended method for both the chemical equation and the potential energy diagram.
rowkem
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
So,

I did 5 labs where I burned certain things and found the temp. diff. in the calorimeter. That said, I calculated the ∆H for the entire system, the ∆H per gram of system substance, and the ∆H per mol of system substance.

Im wondering which ∆H I should be putting into my chemical equation for the reaction, as well the ∆H I should be putting into my potential energy diagram? I have a feeling its the ∆H per mole but, I'd like a second opinion. Thanks,
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Anyone?
 
You should do it on a per mole basis.
 
Most likely you want to use the mols of the substance in your equations. Write out a proper unit formula and you can see for sure whether you need the mols or grams based on what cancels and what you end up with.
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top