Which has highest density/boiling point: neon 20 or 22. Please help

  • Thread starter Thread starter tonto995566
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Neon Point
AI Thread Summary
Neon-22 has a higher density than neon-20 due to its greater mass, as it contains more neutrons. The discussion suggests that neon-22 may also have a higher boiling point because its increased mass could lead to greater resistance to changes in state, requiring more heat to overcome this resistance. The participants express uncertainty but lean towards neon-22 being the correct answer for both density and boiling point. Overall, the relationship between mass and physical properties like density and boiling point is emphasized. Understanding these concepts is crucial for accurately comparing isotopes.
tonto995566
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Pure samples of neon have different densitys and boiling points

b)which has highest density: neon 20 or 22



attempt at answer

I believe that the highest density would be neon 22, infact I am almost sure (lmao if i am wrong :P) I am not so sure about highest boiling point however neon 22 also seems like the logical answer to this as there is more neutrons however i am confused because i am sure i should use both of them :O

please can someone give an answer and explain it :D. This would be greatly appreciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Density is simply mass per unit volume, e.g. kg/m3 or gm/cm3. The nucleus of Ne-22 is approximately 2 amu heavier than the nucleus of Ne-20.

A more massive object offers more resistance to forces/acceleration. What implication might that have for a boiling point?
 
So if that's the case then if more resistance is put up by the neon 22 then it would have the highest boiling point also as it would take more heat for the resistance to be overcome :D. Please feel free to correct if I'm wrong :P

Thankyou very much mate :D

apreciate it, Tonto :D
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top