Which Integration Technique Should I Use for This Triple Integral?

MathematicalPhysics
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
\iiint {\sqrt(R^2 - 2aR\cos\theta + a^2)} R^2 \sin\theta\,dR\,d\theta\,d\phi

with the integration over R between 0 and a
the integration over between 0 and pi
the integration over between 0 and 2pi

Should I use integration by parts or should I take the R^2 sin(theta) under the square root?

Any hints and tips are much appreciated!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Do the \theta integration first (note that the sine outside the root makes this easy).

Beware absolute values in your R integration!
 
Do I need to change the order of integration then and have new limits or can I choose to rearrange it to a more convenient form, like

\iiint {\sqrt(R^2 - 2aR\cos\theta + a^2)} R^2 sin\theta\,d\theta\,dR,d\phi

then integrating wrt \theta by parts?
 
You don't do it by parts!

Note that your integrand equals:
\frac{\partial}{\partial\theta}\frac{R}{3a}(R^{2}-2aR\cos\theta+a^{2})^{\frac{3}{2}}
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top