Which Integration Technique Should I Use for This Triple Integral?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the best integration technique for the triple integral involving the expression \iiint {\sqrt(R^2 - 2aR\cos\theta + a^2)} R^2 \sin\theta\,dR\,d\theta\,d\phi. Participants suggest integrating with respect to \theta first, as the sine function simplifies the process. There is caution advised regarding absolute values during the R integration, raising questions about whether to change the order of integration or adjust limits. It is emphasized that integration by parts is not the appropriate method for this problem. The integrand is noted to have a specific derivative form that could aid in solving the integral.
MathematicalPhysics
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
\iiint {\sqrt(R^2 - 2aR\cos\theta + a^2)} R^2 \sin\theta\,dR\,d\theta\,d\phi

with the integration over R between 0 and a
the integration over between 0 and pi
the integration over between 0 and 2pi

Should I use integration by parts or should I take the R^2 sin(theta) under the square root?

Any hints and tips are much appreciated!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Do the \theta integration first (note that the sine outside the root makes this easy).

Beware absolute values in your R integration!
 
Do I need to change the order of integration then and have new limits or can I choose to rearrange it to a more convenient form, like

\iiint {\sqrt(R^2 - 2aR\cos\theta + a^2)} R^2 sin\theta\,d\theta\,dR,d\phi

then integrating wrt \theta by parts?
 
You don't do it by parts!

Note that your integrand equals:
\frac{\partial}{\partial\theta}\frac{R}{3a}(R^{2}-2aR\cos\theta+a^{2})^{\frac{3}{2}}
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top