Which Lens Material Requires the Most Effort to Craft?

  • Thread starter Thread starter stunner5000pt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lens
AI Thread Summary
The hardest lens to craft is the diamond lens due to its high refractive index of 2.42 and smaller radius of curvature, requiring greater precision and effort. Conversely, the ice lens, with a refractive index of 1.31, is the easiest to make because of its larger radius of curvature and lower refractive index. The glass lens, with an index of 1.52, falls in between in terms of difficulty. A thin symmetric convex lens with a focal length of 10 cm exemplifies these principles. Overall, the radius of curvature significantly impacts the effort required in lens crafting.
stunner5000pt
Messages
1,443
Reaction score
4
If you had to choose between ice(n=1.31), glass (n=1.52), or diamond(n=2.42) which would be the hardest lens to make? Which woukl be the easiest lens to make??

the one with the least radius of curvature would need the most work done on it because of the small value needed. On the other hand if the radius of curvature is large it would be relatively easy to make because of lesser wiork needed to make this lens.

we're talking about making a thin symmetric convex lens here whoe focla length would be 10 cm in all cases.

is this right? is this how this should be understood??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, this is correct. The diamond would be the hardest lens to make as it has the highest refractive index, and the ice lens would be the easiest to make as it has the lowest refractive index.
 


Yes, your understanding is correct. The lens with the smallest radius of curvature would require more precision and effort to make compared to a lens with a larger radius of curvature. Therefore, the diamond lens (n=2.42) would be the hardest to make, while the glass lens (n=1.52) would be the easiest to make. This is because diamond has a higher refractive index and a smaller radius of curvature compared to glass, making it more difficult to shape and polish.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top